Supertraining
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
[Supertraining] Optimal Drop Vertical Starting Height carruthersjam Fri Jul 11 16:38:00 2008
Members may be interested in the below abstract (NSCA conference abstracts 2008): VARIABLES ASSOCIATED WITH OPTIMAL DROP VERTICAL JUMP STARTING HEIGHT Andrea K. Wilson, Lawrence W. Weiss, Brian K. Schilling Plyometric jump training is often used for sports requiring explosive leg and hip movements. Intensity during the initial eccentric phase of jumps may be manipulated by using various drop vertical jump (DVJ) heights. It is likely that an optimal height exists that would elicit optimal jumping performance, and that the optimal height will vary based on subjects' individual characteristics. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to identify the association between the box height producing maximum performance (vertical displacement and reactive strength index or RSI, jump height/contact time) and potential independent predictors such as gender, strength, stature, body mass, body composition, and muscle mechanical properties. METHODS: Subjects were evaluated for gender, height, body mass, body composition, 1RM squat, and muscle stiffness. Following familiarization, subjects completed DVJs from four starting heights: 20cm, 40cm, 68cm, and 77cm. RESULTS: Spearman's Rho correlation analyses revealed significant correlations between box height for maximum vertical displacement and gender (ρ=‐0.447, p<.01), subject stature (ρ=.366, p<.05), body mass (ρ=.415,p<.01), and 1RM squat (ρ=.324, p<.05). None were significantly correlated with box height for maximum RSI. For gender specific analyses, no significant correlations were found between optimal box height for maximum vertical displacement and the independent variables. However, a significant correlation existed for men between optimum box height for maximum RSI and bodyfat (ρ=.711, p<.01). Chi square testing indicated no significant difference in frequencies between optimal starting heights for maximum vertical displacement (total and gender‐specific samples). There was, however, a significant difference in frequencies for RSI for both the sample (χ² =24.90, p<.01) and data split between male subjects (χ² =8.00, p<.05) and female subjects (χ² =9.58, p<.01). CONCLUSIONS: It appears that optimal DVJ starting height is not highly related to the independent measures examined in this research. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: Based on these findings, it is suggested that DVJ testing over a broad range of starting heights should be used to determine which height produces optimal performance. ================ Jamie Carruthers Wakefield, UK
- [Supertraining] Optimal Drop Vertical Starting Height carruthersjam <=
- Re: [Supertraining] Static Contraction Training Ed White
- Re: [Supertraining] Static Contraction Training Nick Tatalias
- Re: [Supertraining] Static Contraction Training W.G. Johnson
- [Supertraining] Re: Static Contraction Training carruthersjam
- [Supertraining] Re: Static Contraction Training Chad Scheitel