Supertraining
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
[Supertraining] Pistorius Research CoachJ1 Fri Jun 19 11:01:10 2009
Just a note to forum members that the much anticipated study from the Houston group "The fastest runner on artificial legs: different limbs, similar function?" (Weyand, Bundle, McGowan, Grabowski, Brown, Kram, and Herr about the testing of Oscar Pistorius is now available at Journal of Applied Physiology (in press). Ken Jakalski Lisle High School Lisle, IL USA The fastest runner on artificial legs: different limbs, similar function? Peter G. Weyand1, Matthew W. Bundle2, Craig P. McGowan3, Alena M. Grabowski4, Mary Beth Brown5, Rodger Kram6*, and Hugh M. Herr4 J Appl Physiol (June 18, 2009). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00174.2009 The recent competitive successes of a bilateral, transtibial amputee sprint runner who races with modern running prostheses has triggered an international controversy regarding the relative function provided by his artificial limbs. Here, we conducted three tests of functional similarity between this amputee sprinter and competitive male runners with intact limbs: the metabolic cost of running, sprinting endurance, and running mechanics. Metabolic and mechanical data, respectively, were acquired via indirect calorimetry and ground reaction force measurement during constant-speed, level treadmill running. First, we found that the mean gross metabolic cost of transport of our amputee sprint subject (174.9 ml O2 kg-1 km-1; speeds: 2.5 to 4.1 m s-1) was only 3.8% lower than mean values for intact-limb elite distance runners and 6.7% lower than for sub-elite distance runners, but 17% lower than for intact-limb 400-meter specialists (210.6 [13.2; SD] ml O2 kg-1 km-1). Second, the speeds our amputee sprinter maintained for six all-out, constant-speed trials to failure (speeds: 6.6-10.8 m s-1; durations: 2-90 s) were within 2.2 [0.6]% of those predicted for intact-limb sprinters. Third, at sprinting speeds of 8.0, 9.0 and 10.0 m s-1, our amputee subject had longer foot-ground contact times (+14.7 [4.2]%), shorter aerial (-26.4 [9.9]%) and swing times (-15.2 [6.9]%), and lower stance-averaged vertical forces (-19.3 [3.1]%) than intact-limb sprinters (top speeds = 10.8 vs.10.8 [0.6] m s-1). We conclude that running on modern, lower-limb sprinting prostheses appears to be physiologically similar, but mechanically different than running with intact limbs.
- [Supertraining] Pistorius Research CoachJ1 <=
- Re: [Supertraining] Pistorius Research PaulA206
- Re: [Supertraining] Pistorius Research CoachJ1
- Re: [Supertraining] Pistorius Research PaulA206
- Re: [Supertraining] Pistorius Research Nick Tatalias
- Re: [Supertraining] Pistorius Research PaulA206
- Re: [Supertraining] Pistorius Research CoachJ1