commons-dev

Hmm, I havent explicitly put the pom.xml under

META_INF/maven/commons-net/commons-net

...I suspect Maven may have done this itself. 


sebb wrote:
> On 28/09/2008, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   
> > Hi all
> >
> >  After the RC inspection a week or so ago, I am putting up a candidate for
> > release. Based on the feedback on the RC, I have made the following changes:
> >
> >  * Excluded the examples/ classes from the binary jar
> >  * Put LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt in META-INF in the FTP-only jar
> >  * Fixed some oddities in the changes.xml document (I dont know what Maven's
> > xdoc processor was doing here)
> >  * Updated the version number
> >  * Updated keys, checksums, etc, and added a release notes doc
> >
> >  As usual, the files are here:
> >
> >  http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-2.0/
> >     
>
> The binary archive contains the Javadocs for the examples.
> Seems no point as the example source is not present, but not a blocker.
>
> The binary archive contains pom.properties and pom.xml in a rather odd
> directory:
>
> META_INF/maven/commons-net/commons-net
>
> Is that correct?
>
>   
> >  Please vote as you feel appropriate!
> >  Thanks
> >
> >  Rory
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >     
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>   


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]