coyotos-dev
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
RE: [coyotos-dev] Scheduler design Valerio Bellizzomi Sun Aug 13 16:59:43 2006
On 23/03/2006, at 20.00, Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote: >On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 11:17 +0100, Valerio Bellizzomi wrote: > >> Ok, so there should be a means to dedicate (at runtime) one CPU to a >single >> non-preempted process. That is, one process on one CPU gets an infinite >> time slice. >Why should such an option exist? Primarily for scientific programs where you want to use every single cycle, and for urgent long-running system diagnostics, the advantage could be spending less time in context switches. It could be also a very long time slice, not infinite. Depending on the situation it may be acceptable to be preempted once in a while. val _______________________________________________ coyotos-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/coyotos-dev
- Re: [coyotos-dev] Scheduler design Valerio Bellizzomi
- RE: [coyotos-dev] Scheduler design Jonathan S. Shapiro
- RE: [coyotos-dev] Scheduler design Valerio Bellizzomi
- RE: [coyotos-dev] Scheduler design Jonathan S. Shapiro
- RE: [coyotos-dev] Scheduler design Valerio Bellizzomi <=
- RE: [coyotos-dev] Scheduler design Valerio Bellizzomi
- RE: [coyotos-dev] Scheduler design Valerio Bellizzomi
- RE: [coyotos-dev] Scheduler design Jonathan S. Shapiro
- RE: [coyotos-dev] Scheduler design Valerio Bellizzomi
- RE: [coyotos-dev] Scheduler design Jonathan S. Shapiro
- RE: [coyotos-dev] Scheduler design Valerio Bellizzomi
- RE: [coyotos-dev] Scheduler design Jonathan S. Shapiro
- RE: [coyotos-dev] Scheduler design Valerio Bellizzomi
- RE: [coyotos-dev] Scheduler design Jonathan S. Shapiro
- RE: [coyotos-dev] Scheduler design Valerio Bellizzomi