fedora-devel-list
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Richard W.M. Jones Mon Oct 13 02:00:23 2008
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 05:20:30PM -0400, Braden McDaniel wrote: > A copy of the libtool script is typically included in a package. > Breakage such as that patch fixes would only be incurred if > libtoolize/autoreconf were run as part of the build process--something > that simply shouldn't be happening in general for RPM builds. If I parse that correctly, are you saying that autoreconf *shouldn't* be run as part of an RPM build? I have found that it sometimes needs autoreconf if I patch the configure.ac script -- something which happens rather more frequently when porting to MinGW. (After these patches go upstream then it won't be a problem of course). Rich. -- Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones Read my OCaml programming blog: http://camltastic.blogspot.com/ Fedora now supports 68 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#) http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora -- fedora-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
- Re: CMake!, (continued)
- Re: CMake! Richard W.M. Jones
- Re: CMake! Braden McDaniel
- Re: CMake! Denis Leroy
- Re: CMake! Kevin Kofler
- Re: CMake! Braden McDaniel
- Re: CMake! Debarshi Ray
- Re: CMake! Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Braden McDaniel
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Dan Nicholson
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Braden McDaniel
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Richard W.M. Jones <=
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Dan Nicholson
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Kevin Kofler
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Jens Petersen
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Behdad Esfahbod
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Conrad Meyer
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Braden McDaniel
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Conrad Meyer
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Kevin Kofler
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Kevin Kofler