fedora-devel-list
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Till Maas Mon Oct 13 02:00:53 2008
On Sat October 11 2008, Kevin Kofler wrote: > And this is a really complex solution with lots of manual work for the > maintainer to do at each upstream release (your proposed Makefile.common > snippets only automate small parts of it, which are just basic diff and > patch invocations anyway), you didn't even list all of them (for example, > the source tarball has to be extracted to rediff a patch). I guess you do not know the make targets I posted, because "make prep" already extracts the source tarball, applies the patches and if you use "-b .foo" in the %patch, even a bar.foo backup file for bar is generated, so you can easily use gendiff. I do not see which commands were missing, except a cvs commit, which has to be done anyways. Regards, Till
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X?, (continued)
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Braden McDaniel
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Richard W.M. Jones
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Dan Nicholson
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Kevin Kofler
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Braden McDaniel
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Dan Nicholson
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Till Maas
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Kevin Kofler
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Till Maas
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Kevin Kofler
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Till Maas <=
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Braden McDaniel
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? D. Hugh Redelmeier
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Braden McDaniel
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Braden McDaniel
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Karsten Hopp
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Dan Nicholson
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Braden McDaniel
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Karsten Hopp
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Toshio Kuratomi
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Braden McDaniel