fedora-devel-list

[Prev] Thread [Next]  |  [Prev] Date [Next]

Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? D. Hugh Redelmeier Mon Oct 13 02:03:25 2008 

| From: Braden McDaniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

| Yes, but the kind of patches that should be sent upstream are not the
| ones resulting in 300 busted packages from a libtool upgrade.  We're
| talking about patches applied by a specfile build.

Could you characterize the problems that cause 300 busted packages?

Naive questions:

- Might a reasonable patch to libtool 2.2 fix a lot of these problems?
  (And no, I don't mean "patch it back to 2.1.")

- Would it make sense to allow multiple versions of libtools co-exist
  on a system and allow a .spec declaration of some kind specify which
  to use?

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list