fedora-devel-list
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 9 - 2008-11-14 David Huff Mon Dec 01 15:00:20 2008
Jesse Keating wrote: > Hrm, I'm looking through everything that was successfully excluded in
the last compose, everything seems to be using ExcludeArch instead of ExclusiveArch. It's possible our treatment of ExclusiveArch isn't correct, again because we have to add noarch to the list. What's the reasoning for your use of Exclusive vs ExcludeArch ?
I used ExclusiveArch to match qemu, which is what it depends on, however qemu is an arch specific rpm.
Building with ExcludeArch does build. I'll throw it against rawhide and see if mash picks it up or not. -D -- fedora-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
- Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 9 - 2008-11-14, (continued)
- Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 9 - 2008-11-14 David Huff
- Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 9 - 2008-11-14 Michael Schwendt
- Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 9 - 2008-11-14 Matthew Woehlke
- Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 9 - 2008-11-14 David Huff
- Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 9 - 2008-11-14 Jesse Keating
- Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 9 - 2008-11-14 David Huff
- Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 9 - 2008-11-14 Michael Schwendt
- Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 9 - 2008-11-14 Jesse Keating
- Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 9 - 2008-11-14 David Huff
- Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 9 - 2008-11-14 Jesse Keating
- Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 9 - 2008-11-14 David Huff <=
- Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 9 - 2008-11-14 Michael Schwendt
Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 9 - 2008-11-14 Debarshi Ray Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 9 - 2008-11-14 Jens Petersen