fedora-devel-list
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
Re: Round 3 starting (was: Re: Python 2.6 clear for Rawhide) Kevin Kofler Mon Dec 01 15:01:22 2008
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
> This round is composed of packages that contain compiled Python code but
> do not have a Requires of python(abi). Please note that this is a
> packaging bug as the bytecode is specific to the version of the Python
> it was compiled with. Whether this is a problem with rpm's macros or
> with the package itself must be dealt with on a case-by-case basis.
Are you really _sure_ all those packages contain Python bytecode?
In particular, where's the bytecode in these?
> kdelibs
> kdesdk
> kdevelop
> koffice
> konq-plugins
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
- Round 2 starting (was: Re: Python 2.6 clear for Rawhide), (continued)
- Round 2 starting (was: Re: Python 2.6 clear for Rawhide) Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
- Re: Round 2 starting Pierre-Yves
- Re: Round 2 starting Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
- Re: Round 2 starting Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: Round 2 starting Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
Second Report (was: Re: Python 2.6 clear for Rawhide) Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams Round 3 starting (was: Re: Python 2.6 clear for Rawhide) Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
- Re: Round 3 starting Pádraig Brady
- Re: Round 3 starting Toshio Kuratomi
- Re: Round 3 starting Jeremy Katz
- Re: Round 3 starting (was: Re: Python 2.6 clear for Rawhide) Kevin Kofler <=
Third Report (was: Re: Python 2.6 clear for Rawhide) Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams Synopsis (was: Re: Python 2.6 clear for Rawhide) Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams