fedora-devel-list
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Jens Petersen Mon Dec 01 20:00:34 2008
----- "Kevin Kofler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * start discouraging shipping pregenerated files, instead make sure that > autoreconf actually works (which mainly amounts to the above point about > backwards compatibility). > But unfortunately, this won't solve the problem of the reliance on the shell, > and as configure.ac scripts can contain arbitrary shell snippets, this can't > really be fixed without a major redesign, the result of which would > effectively > no longer be autotools. I would add: * do not start new projects using autotools as far as possible -- fedora-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
- Re: CMake!, (continued)
- Re: CMake! Kevin Kofler
- Re: CMake! Braden McDaniel
- Re: CMake! Debarshi Ray
- Re: CMake! Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Braden McDaniel
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Dan Nicholson
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Braden McDaniel
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Richard W.M. Jones
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Dan Nicholson
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Kevin Kofler
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Jens Petersen <=
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Behdad Esfahbod
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Conrad Meyer
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Braden McDaniel
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Conrad Meyer
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Kevin Kofler
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Kevin Kofler
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Conrad Meyer
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Ralph Angenendt