fedora-devel-list
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Behdad Esfahbod Mon Dec 01 20:00:37 2008
Jens Petersen wrote: > ----- "Kevin Kofler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> * start discouraging shipping pregenerated files, instead make sure that >> autoreconf actually works (which mainly amounts to the above point about >> backwards compatibility). >> But unfortunately, this won't solve the problem of the reliance on the >> shell, >> and as configure.ac scripts can contain arbitrary shell snippets, this can't >> really be fixed without a major redesign, the result of which would >> effectively >> no longer be autotools. > > I would add: > > * do not start new projects using autotools as far as possible Maybe you can offer an alternative? And no, I don't mean reciting names of some hacks some cool kids may have put together for their birthday... And not something that requires me to install it first before I can build this tarball I downloaded. behdad -- fedora-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
- Re: CMake!, (continued)
- Re: CMake! Braden McDaniel
- Re: CMake! Debarshi Ray
- Re: CMake! Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Braden McDaniel
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Dan Nicholson
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Braden McDaniel
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Richard W.M. Jones
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Dan Nicholson
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Kevin Kofler
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Jens Petersen
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Behdad Esfahbod <=
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Conrad Meyer
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Braden McDaniel
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Conrad Meyer
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Kevin Kofler
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Kevin Kofler
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Conrad Meyer
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Ralph Angenendt
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Ralf Corsepius