fedora-devel-list
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Ralf Corsepius Mon Dec 01 21:00:24 2008
On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 22:28 -0500, Jens Petersen wrote: > ----- "Kevin Kofler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * start discouraging shipping pregenerated files, instead make sure that > > autoreconf actually works (which mainly amounts to the above point about > > backwards compatibility). > > But unfortunately, this won't solve the problem of the reliance on the > > shell, > > and as configure.ac scripts can contain arbitrary shell snippets, this > > can't > > really be fixed without a major redesign, the result of which would > > effectively > > no longer be autotools. > > I would add: > > * do not start new projects using autotools as far as possible I would recommend you to stop spreading FUD. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X?, (continued)
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Braden McDaniel
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Richard W.M. Jones
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Dan Nicholson
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Kevin Kofler
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Jens Petersen
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Behdad Esfahbod
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Conrad Meyer
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Braden McDaniel
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Conrad Meyer
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Kevin Kofler
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Ralf Corsepius <=
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Kevin Kofler
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Conrad Meyer
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Ralph Angenendt
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Conrad Meyer
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Kevin Kofler
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Toshio Kuratomi