fedora-devel-list
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Richard W.M. Jones Wed Dec 03 03:00:26 2008
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 10:28:53PM -0500, Jens Petersen wrote: > I would add: > > * do not start new projects using autotools as far as possible This is stupid advice. Autotools is by far the easiest way to build successfully on all platforms, and to cross-compile code. I invite you to try cross-compiling (for example) gtk2 versus boost, and you will see that writing your own build system, or using a lesser build system that doesn't have all the experience behind it of autotools (or cmake), is an idiotic idea. Rich. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X?, (continued)
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Patrice Dumas
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Matthew Woehlke
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Colin Walters
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Karel Zak
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Kevin Kofler
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Richard W.M. Jones
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Ed Hill
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Kevin Kofler
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Ed Hill
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Kevin Kofler
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Richard W.M. Jones <=
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Braden McDaniel
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Dan Nicholson
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Till Maas
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Kevin Kofler
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Till Maas
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Kevin Kofler
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Till Maas
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Braden McDaniel
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? D. Hugh Redelmeier
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Braden McDaniel