fedora-devel-list
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
Re: rpms/libxml2/devel libxml2.spec,1.65,1.66 Panu Matilainen Wed Dec 03 09:00:35 2008
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
Panu Matilainen wrote, at 12/04/2008 12:43 AM +9:00:Well the question is, should rpm-build require everything it can extract dependencies from? That would drag in mono and whatnot... and rpm-build itself certainly does not require pkg-config to function.Adding dependency on pkgconfig is no big deal, but the line between what should go to rpm-build dependencies and what to buildsys groups is rather fuzzy.- Panu -So this contains packaging guidelines issue - If FPC says "all packages which creates pkgconfig .pc file must have _Build_Requires: pkgconfig", then rpm-build (or buildsys) does not have to add pkgconfig dependency - If FPC says no, then rpm-build or buildsys must have pkgconfig dependency My current opinition is that rpm-build should have "Requires: pkgconfig" because this affects even a small package and guideline changes due to this issue will affect many packages.
Yup, pkg-config is a bit special in that many packages which provide a pkg-config file don't actually require it themselves (for build), causing unresolvable dependencies all too easily. Already done and building, will be in rawhide in a few minutes.
- Panu -
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
- Re: rpms/libxml2/devel libxml2.spec,1.65,1.66 Mamoru Tasaka
- Re: rpms/libxml2/devel libxml2.spec,1.65,1.66 Todd Zullinger
- Re: rpms/libxml2/devel libxml2.spec,1.65,1.66 Todd Zullinger
- Re: rpms/libxml2/devel libxml2.spec,1.65,1.66 Panu Matilainen
- Re: rpms/libxml2/devel libxml2.spec,1.65,1.66 Mamoru Tasaka
- Re: rpms/libxml2/devel libxml2.spec,1.65,1.66 Panu Matilainen <=
- Re: rpms/libxml2/devel libxml2.spec,1.65,1.66 Till Maas