fedora-devel-list
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Enrico Scholz Wed Dec 03 09:01:22 2008
Kevin Kofler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * m4's arcane syntax, including considerations like when to quote things
> where, but also just the syntax itself (dnl for comments, [] for quoting
> etc.)
At least, 'm4' *has* quoting rules, while it's always an adventure with
'cmake' to write some non trivial things. autotool's language is consistent
across its tasks ('make all', 'make install', 'make check', 'make dist'),
while 'cmake' uses different tools with different syntax/quoting rules and
mechanisms for them. There is so much black magic in 'cmake' that it works
for trivial tasks but it is a nightmare to handle complex things with it.
Enrico
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X?, (continued)
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Kevin Kofler
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Jerry Amundson
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Kevin Kofler
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Till Maas
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Kevin Kofler
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Till Maas
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Kevin Kofler
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Ralf Ertzinger
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Rahul Sundaram
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Enrico Scholz <=
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Matthew Woehlke
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Toshio Kuratomi
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Matthew Woehlke
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Patrice Dumas
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Matthew Woehlke
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Patrice Dumas
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Matthew Woehlke
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Patrice Dumas
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Matthew Woehlke
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Colin Walters