fedora-devel-list
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Kevin Kofler Wed Dec 03 10:00:25 2008
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> The autotools do not apply a central data base, they keep
> "configuration" and "installation" as separate jobs. cmake lumps them
> together.
Uh no, it doesn't.
CMake:
Configuration: cmake . or cmake ..
Building: make
Installing: make install/fast (or "make install" if you want it to do all
the dependency checks the "make" step already did again like the autotools
always do)
Autotools:
Configuration: ./configure or ../configure
Building: make
Installing: make install
The only extra job the autotools have is the useless "autogenerate and/or
files" (a.k.a. autoreconf) step, which is exactly the one I'm complaining
about.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X?, (continued)
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Kevin Kofler
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Conrad Meyer
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Ralph Angenendt
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Conrad Meyer
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Kevin Kofler
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Toshio Kuratomi
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Kevin Kofler <=
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Kevin Kofler
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Kevin Kofler
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Till Maas
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Till Maas
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Kevin Kofler
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Matthew Woehlke
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Matthew Woehlke
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Kevin Kofler