fedora-devel-list
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Kevin Kofler Wed Dec 03 22:00:24 2008
Till Maas wrote:
> The problem is, that the non verbose build mode hides, whether or not the
> RPM_OPT_FLAGS are honoured, but it is required to honour them. Maybe cmake
> needs a way to tell it to only show the compiler invocations, but not the
> remaining stuff, that is shown with VERBOSE=1 and not useful.
RPM_OPT_FLAGS are always honored when you use the %cmake or %cmake_kde4
macros, unless the CMakeLists.txt does something really strange to CFLAGS.
And really, checking that the RPM_OPT_FLAGS are used is something that
should be done once during review and then it should just be the case.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X?, (continued)
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Till Maas
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Kevin Kofler
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Matthew Woehlke
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Matthew Woehlke
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Kevin Kofler
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Jerry Amundson
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Kevin Kofler
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Till Maas
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Kevin Kofler <=
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Till Maas
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Kevin Kofler
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Ralf Ertzinger
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Rahul Sundaram
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Enrico Scholz
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Matthew Woehlke
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Toshio Kuratomi
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Matthew Woehlke
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Patrice Dumas
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Matthew Woehlke