fedora-devel-list
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Ralf Ertzinger Thu Dec 04 00:00:49 2008
Hi. On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 18:24:02 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > I'd rather we disable the verbose mode (which unfortunately got just > enabled globally, but all the KDE packages were already using it > anyway): that one spams the log with a lot more lines, Who cares? If the build succeeded noone will read it, anyway, and log files compress quite well. If the build failed, however, I'd like as much information as possible telling me what exactly was going on when it failed. That includes all options to all commands being run, otherwise you just go around guessing. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X?, (continued)
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Matthew Woehlke
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Kevin Kofler
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Jerry Amundson
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Kevin Kofler
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Till Maas
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Kevin Kofler
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Till Maas
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Kevin Kofler
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Ralf Ertzinger <=
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Rahul Sundaram
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Enrico Scholz
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Matthew Woehlke
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Toshio Kuratomi
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Matthew Woehlke
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Patrice Dumas
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Matthew Woehlke
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Patrice Dumas
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Matthew Woehlke
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Patrice Dumas