fedora-devel-list
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Rahul Sundaram Thu Dec 04 01:00:53 2008
Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
Hi. On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 18:24:02 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:I'd rather we disable the verbose mode (which unfortunately got just enabled globally, but all the KDE packages were already using it anyway): that one spams the log with a lot more lines,Who cares? If the build succeeded noone will read it, anyway, and log files compress quite well.
Even, if the build succeeds, there is always good reasons to read the logs. A successful build doesn't always lead to working software. Sometimes there are subtle mistakes you can catch early on, by reading the build logs each time.
Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X?, (continued)
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Matthew Woehlke
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Kevin Kofler
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Jerry Amundson
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Kevin Kofler
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Till Maas
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Kevin Kofler
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Till Maas
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Kevin Kofler
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Ralf Ertzinger
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Rahul Sundaram <=
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Enrico Scholz
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Matthew Woehlke
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Toshio Kuratomi
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Matthew Woehlke
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Patrice Dumas
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Matthew Woehlke
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Patrice Dumas
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Matthew Woehlke
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Patrice Dumas
- Re: Status of libtool 2.2.X? Matthew Woehlke