fedora-devel-list
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
Re: Fedora 10 and YUM Mark Bidewell Thu Dec 04 10:01:02 2008
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Geoff Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > I'm seeing this as well, seems to be in BZ 459756 and 471450. It seems > as though at least some DNS servers get confused by the parallel AAAA > and A queries and only respond to one of them. The worst part is that > the nature of the problem will make it hard to update to a fixed > implementation. I think this particular issue is worth a mention in > Bugs/F10Common because it seems to be relatively wide spread (seems to > be impacting comcast users reliably). > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list > Interesting data point as I am also a Comcast user. Also, even though it would appear that we have narrowed down the cause, it case it is relevant, here is my router configuration: Buffalo WHR-G125 running DD-WRT v24-sp1. Mark Bidewell
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
- Re: Fedora 10 and YUM, (continued)
- Re: Fedora 10 and YUM Christian Iseli
- Re: Fedora 10 and YUM Seth Vidal
- Re: Fedora 10 and YUM Christian Iseli
- Re: Fedora 10 and YUM Seth Vidal
- Re: Fedora 10 and YUM Tim Niemueller
- Re: Fedora 10 and YUM Seth Vidal
- Re: Fedora 10 and YUM Mark Bidewell
- Re: Fedora 10 and YUM Gary Thomas
- Re: Fedora 10 and YUM Camilo Mesias
- Re: Fedora 10 and YUM Geoff Reedy
- Re: Fedora 10 and YUM Mark Bidewell <=
- Re: Fedora 10 and YUM Tim Niemueller
- Re: Fedora 10 and YUM Jonathan Underwood
- Re: Fedora 10 and YUM Mark Bidewell
- Re: Fedora 10 and YUM Mark Bidewell
- Re: Fedora 10 and YUM Christopher Stone