fedora-devel-list
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
Re: Abrt - should this be a feature? Zdenek Prikryl Mon May 18 08:00:38 2009
Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ABRT > > It was broken when tested > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Test_Days/2009-02-26 Yes, the test day explored several bugs (for this purpose the test day was), but critical bugs are fixed, some of feature requests are implemented. So imho the current state of abrt is good :-) > Bug Buddy seems to the default still for GNOME. Why is it in the feature > list? FESCo should reconsider this feature. In F11 abrt doesn't replace bb, they can be enabled at the same time. Note that abrt can catch more crashes than bb can (like non-gnome programs, kernel crashes [kerneloops], ...). -- Zdenek Prikryl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- fedora-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
- Abrt - should this be a feature? Rahul Sundaram
- Re: Abrt - should this be a feature? Kevin Fenzi
- Re: Abrt - should this be a feature? Zdenek Prikryl <=
- Re: Abrt - should this be a feature? Rahul Sundaram
- Re: Abrt - should this be a feature? Jiri Moskovcak
- Re: Abrt - should this be a feature? Colin Walters
- Re: Abrt - should this be a feature? Zdenek Prikryl
- Re: Abrt - should this be a feature? Jaroslav Reznik
- Re: Abrt - should this be a feature? Colin Walters
- Re: Abrt - should this be a feature? Matej Cepl
- Re: Abrt - should this be a feature? Jiri Moskovcak
- Re: Abrt - should this be a feature? Jan Kratochvil
- Re: Abrt - should this be a feature? Matej Cepl