fedora-devel-list
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Jerry James Wed May 20 11:00:41 2009
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The policy "came from" legal concerns. Thus I think it's a a good idea > to address it before we have to scramble to do so. I thought it was a > better policy than 'no flags', but perhaps it's not. s/legal concerns/political concerns/ Right? -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
- Re: Youth Protection: Was Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy, (continued)
- Re: Youth Protection: Was Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Tom \"spot\" Callaway
- Re: Youth Protection: Was Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Chris Weyl
- Re: Youth Protection: Was Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Frank Murphy (Frankly3d)
- Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Josh Boyer
- Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Josh Boyer
- Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Jerry James <=
- Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Kevin Kofler
- Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Kevin Kofler
- Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Toshio Kuratomi
- Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Paul W. Frields
- Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Jukka Ruohonen
- Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Josh Boyer
- Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Josh Boyer
Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Josh Boyer