fedora-devel-list
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
Re: Youth Protection: Was Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Chris Weyl Wed May 20 22:00:39 2009
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 8:08 PM, Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
>
>> On 05/20/2009 01:24 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>
>>> Well, I am sure, FESCO will now will initiate the necessary measures to
>>> initiate the "youth protection" certification processes, whose absence
>>> so far legally threads Fedora vendors/distributors from different
>>> countries around the globe?
>>>
>>
>> We actually have this pretty well covered wrt to US laws. :)
>>
>
> We are talking about the "national laws" threating
> users/vendors/re-distributors in a particular country.
>
> Wrt. "youth protection", US laws are widely irrelevant. It's similar to US
> "alcohol/tobacco/drug laws", "weapon laws", "medication laws", "car part
> regulations". At least in my country (Germany), they are widely irrelevant.
>
> Relevant wrt. "youth protection" on SW in Germany are computer games. Very
> oversimplified, in general, it's illegal in Germany to make
> "non-USK-certified/rated" computer games available to people below certain
> age, rsp. in some cases, to distribute them at all.
>
Fedora, as a project of a US corporation, is liable for violation of the
laws of the State of North Carolina and of the United States. We're not
liable for violation of the laws of any other jurisdiction... Whether it's
over "protect teh [sic] children!", maps that have Israel on them, or flags.
Do we really want to start excluding content just because it's illegal in
some other jurisdiction? This seems.... slippery.
-Chris
--
Chris Weyl
Ex astris, scientia
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
- Re: export policy, was Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy, (continued)
- Re: export policy, was Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Tom \"spot\" Callaway
- Re: export policy, was Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Chris Adams
- Re: export policy, was Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Tom \"spot\" Callaway
- Re: export policy, was Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy D. Hugh Redelmeier
- Re: export policy, was Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Tom \"spot\" Callaway
- Re: export policy, was Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Paul Wouters
- Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Kevin Fenzi
- Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Ralf Corsepius
- Youth Protection: Was Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Tom \"spot\" Callaway
- Re: Youth Protection: Was Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Youth Protection: Was Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Chris Weyl <=
- Re: Youth Protection: Was Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Youth Protection: Was Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Tom \"spot\" Callaway
- Re: Youth Protection: Was Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Paul Wouters
- Re: Youth Protection: Was Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Jon Ciesla
- Re: Youth Protection: Was Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Seth Vidal
- Re: Youth Protection: Was Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Christopher Stone
- Re: Youth Protection: Was Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Jesse Keating
- Re: Youth Protection: Was Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Chris Weyl
- Re: Youth Protection: Was Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Tom \"spot\" Callaway
- Re: Youth Protection: Was Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Chris Weyl