fedora-devel-list
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
Re: Youth Protection: Was Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Ralf Corsepius Wed May 20 23:00:34 2009
Chris Weyl wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 8:08 PM, Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:On 05/20/2009 01:24 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:Well, I am sure, FESCO will now will initiate the necessary measures to initiate the "youth protection" certification processes, whose absence so far legally threads Fedora vendors/distributors from different countries around the globe?We actually have this pretty well covered wrt to US laws. :)We are talking about the "national laws" threating users/vendors/re-distributors in a particular country. Wrt. "youth protection", US laws are widely irrelevant. It's similar to US "alcohol/tobacco/drug laws", "weapon laws", "medication laws", "car part regulations". At least in my country (Germany), they are widely irrelevant. Relevant wrt. "youth protection" on SW in Germany are computer games. Very oversimplified, in general, it's illegal in Germany to make "non-USK-certified/rated" computer games available to people below certain age, rsp. in some cases, to distribute them at all.Fedora, as a project of a US corporation, is liable for violation of the laws of the State of North Carolina and of the United States. We're notliable for violation of the laws of any other jurisdiction...
ACK.
ACK, nor Tibet, or Nagorno-Karabakh, Kosovo, FYR of Macedonia, Cuba, Palestina, just to mention a few other controversial countries ....Whether it's over "protect teh [sic] children!", maps that have Israel on them, or flags.
Do we really want to start excluding content just because it's illegal in some other jurisdiction? This seems.... slippery.
ACK.I am simply trying to demonstrate the impact of the can of worms Spot, FESCO and RH-Legal have opened. If they were consequent, they now _will have to take care_ with this kind of issues, world-wide!
Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
- Re: export policy, was Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy, (continued)
- Re: export policy, was Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Chris Adams
- Re: export policy, was Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Tom \"spot\" Callaway
- Re: export policy, was Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy D. Hugh Redelmeier
- Re: export policy, was Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Tom \"spot\" Callaway
- Re: export policy, was Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Paul Wouters
- Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Kevin Fenzi
- Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Ralf Corsepius
- Youth Protection: Was Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Tom \"spot\" Callaway
- Re: Youth Protection: Was Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Youth Protection: Was Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Chris Weyl
- Re: Youth Protection: Was Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Ralf Corsepius <=
- Re: Youth Protection: Was Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Tom \"spot\" Callaway
- Re: Youth Protection: Was Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Paul Wouters
- Re: Youth Protection: Was Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Jon Ciesla
- Re: Youth Protection: Was Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Seth Vidal
- Re: Youth Protection: Was Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Christopher Stone
- Re: Youth Protection: Was Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Jesse Keating
- Re: Youth Protection: Was Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Chris Weyl
- Re: Youth Protection: Was Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Tom \"spot\" Callaway
- Re: Youth Protection: Was Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Chris Weyl
- Re: Youth Protection: Was Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy Frank Murphy (Frankly3d)