fedora-devel-list
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
Re: [Phoronix] Ubuntu 9.04 vs. Fedora 11 Performance Rahul Sundaram Fri Jun 12 07:00:47 2009
On 06/12/2009 06:42 PM, Kyle McMartin wrote: > It's almost certainly attributable to the default install using audit. > Roland and various others have done a lot of work improving things, but > there is always going to be a per-syscall overhead to this kind of > thing. A few extra usec a syscall adds up after a few hundred thousand > calls... Is there a benefit to running audit by default? Is it worth the cost? Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
- Re: [Phoronix] Ubuntu 9.04 vs. Fedora 11 Performance, (continued)
- Re: [Phoronix] Ubuntu 9.04 vs. Fedora 11 Performance Paul W. Frields
- Re: [Phoronix] Ubuntu 9.04 vs. Fedora 11 Performance Chris Ball
- Re: [Phoronix] Ubuntu 9.04 vs. Fedora 11 Performance Adam Williamson
Re: [Phoronix] Ubuntu 9.04 vs. Fedora 11 Performance Xose Vazquez Perez
- Re: [Phoronix] Ubuntu 9.04 vs. Fedora 11 Performance Eric Sandeen
- Re: [Phoronix] Ubuntu 9.04 vs. Fedora 11 Performance Jeff Spaleta
- Re: [Phoronix] Ubuntu 9.04 vs. Fedora 11 Performance Eric Sandeen
Re: [Phoronix] Ubuntu 9.04 vs. Fedora 11 Performance Xose Vazquez Perez
- Re: [Phoronix] Ubuntu 9.04 vs. Fedora 11 Performance Harald Hoyer
- Re: [Phoronix] Ubuntu 9.04 vs. Fedora 11 Performance Kyle McMartin
- Re: [Phoronix] Ubuntu 9.04 vs. Fedora 11 Performance Rahul Sundaram <=
- Re: [Phoronix] Ubuntu 9.04 vs. Fedora 11 Performance Adam Williamson
- Re: [Phoronix] Ubuntu 9.04 vs. Fedora 11 Performance Rahul Sundaram
- Re: [Phoronix] Ubuntu 9.04 vs. Fedora 11 Performance Chris Adams
- Re: [Phoronix] Ubuntu 9.04 vs. Fedora 11 Performance Gregory Maxwell
Re: [Phoronix] Ubuntu 9.04 vs. Fedora 11 Performance Xose Vazquez Perez