fedora-devel-list
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
Re: Signing server? (Re: Updates testing for F-11) Kevin Kofler Fri Jun 12 09:01:03 2009
Christoph Wickert wrote:
> In most cases the biggest part (consuming time and cpu cycles) of the
> updates is not installing them but everything else like checking for new
> packages, downloading the metadata, calculating dependencies,
> downloading the packages and running the transaction test. Especially
> for small updates this takes much more time than the actual "rpm -U"
> part.
If you include just the urgent stuff in daily updates, those will still be
the same.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
- Re: Updates testing for F-11, (continued)
- Re: Updates testing for F-11 Bruno Wolff III
- Re: Updates testing for F-11 Josh Boyer
- Signing server? (Re: Updates testing for F-11) Christoph Wickert
- Re: Signing server? (Re: Updates testing for F-11) Josh Boyer
- Re: Signing server? (Re: Updates testing for F-11) Christoph Wickert
- Re: Signing server? (Re: Updates testing for F-11) Kevin Kofler
- Re: Signing server? (Re: Updates testing for F-11) Josh Boyer
- Re: Signing server? (Re: Updates testing for F-11) Kevin Kofler
- Re: Signing server? (Re: Updates testing for F-11) Josh Boyer
- Re: Signing server? (Re: Updates testing for F-11) Christoph Wickert
- Re: Signing server? (Re: Updates testing for F-11) Kevin Kofler <=
- Re: Signing server? (Re: Updates testing for F-11) Toshio Kuratomi
- Re: Signing server? (Re: Updates testing for F-11) Christoph Wickert
- Re: Signing server? (Re: Updates testing for F-11) Luke Macken
- Re: Signing server? (Re: Updates testing for F-11) Seth Vidal
- Re: Signing server? (Re: Updates testing for F-11) Jesse Keating
- Re: Updates testing for F-11 Luke Macken