fedora-devel-list
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26 Seth Vidal Fri Jun 26 15:00:26 2009
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
17:32:01 <zodbot> jds2001: #170 (Rename "Desktop" live image to "GNOME" live image) - FESCo - Trac - https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/170 17:32:06 <Kevin_Kofler> This one is my proposal. See the ticket for the rationale.[cut]17:34:03 <Kevin_Kofler> It stops misleading users about the contents of the image. 17:34:30 <skvidal> Kevin_Kofler: misleading? cmon, 1. it doesn't really matter and 2. do you think we're going to take a hit on false advertising? :PIt is sad to read the full log and see that your top argument is "it doesn't really matter". I would expect more depth and reasoning from a FESCo member. It *does* matter; in fact, the current scheme is *disturbing* to some of us. Even if we were a tiny minority (which I believe we are not), as a FESCo member you shouldn't ignore us and make such jokes: "false advertising? :P". Instead, working on to cure the current annoyance will be appreciated. It doesn't really matter much which path you take when you are working on it but just... don't ignore. I suggest reminding yourself that you are a steering committee member and save your comedy skills for somewhere else. Today, you lost some points.
I suggest everyone cut the drama. We're talking about whether or not the live cd is labeled as 'gnome desktop' or leaving it as it currently is which says: 'fedora 11 desktop edition: featuring the gnome desktop'.
I don't see the need for the distinction.Furthermore, I was being flippant b/c I thought the claim that Kevin was making was a bit over the top. Misleading? That implies intent and no one is intending to mislead anyone.
Now, I don't understand why it is - but there seems to be a contigent of people who work on the KDE packaging for fedora who believe that KDE is being slighted or biased against in some way.
We have a default install of Fedora. It installs a desktop that features gnome.
There is no bias there, it just in reality.Maybe reality has an anti-kde bias, but it's not been put there by anyone on fesco, the board or anyone else. Being melodramatic about it is not going to change anything.
-sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
- FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26 Jon Stanley
- Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26 Orcan Ogetbil
- Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26 Seth Vidal <=
- Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26 Kevin Kofler
- Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26 Guido Grazioli
- Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26 Kevin Kofler
- Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26 Guido Grazioli
- Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26 Jesse Keating
- Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26 Adam Miller
- Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26 Ian Weller
- Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26 Adam Miller
- Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26 Jon Stanley
- Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26 Kevin Kofler