fedora-devel-list
Index by Thread
Index by Date
- autodownloader, live spins and packaging Bruno Wolff III
- Re: autodownloader, live spins and packaging Rahul Sundaram
- Re: autodownloader, live spins and packaging Bruno Wolff III
- Re: autodownloader, live spins and packaging Rahul Sundaram
- Building packages for EPEL Dennis Gilmore
- Re: Building packages for EPEL Devrim GÜNDÜZ
- Re: Building packages for EPEL Mat Booth
- Spins SIG could use some more active participants Bruno Wolff III
- Suggestion for improvement https://admin.fedoraproject.org/community Jochen Schmitt
- Heads-Up: rtkit Lennart Poettering
- Outage Notification - 2009-06-23 20:00 UTC Mike McGrath
- Packaging PHP Patrick MONNERAT
- Re: Packaging PHP Christopher Stone
- Re: Packaging PHP Remi Collet
- Re: Packaging PHP Patrick MONNERAT
- Re: Packaging PHP Christopher Stone
- Why do we need FC version attached to the package name? Bharath
- Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name? drago01
- Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name? Michael Schwendt
- Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name? Jussi Lehtola
- Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name? Nathanael D. Noblet
- Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name? Dave Jones
- Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name? Jesse Keating
- Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name? Rahul Sundaram
- Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name? Jesse Keating
- Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name? Jussi Lehtola
- Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name? Jesse Keating
- Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name? Kevin Kofler
- Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name? Rahul Sundaram
- Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name? Josh Boyer
- Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name? Rahul Sundaram
- Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name? Josh Boyer
- Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name? Rahul Sundaram
- Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name? Josh Boyer
- Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name? Nicolas Mailhot
- Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name? Rahul Sundaram
- Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name? Jerry James
- Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name? Dave Jones
- Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name? Jeff Spaleta
- Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name? Tom Lane
- Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name? Michael Schwendt
- Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name? Jesse Keating
- Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name? Michael Schwendt
- Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name? drago01