[Prev] Thread [Next] |
[Prev] Date [Next]
Re: X does not want to start
Fri Jun 26 09:01:09 2009
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:51:15 +0200
"Stevan Tiefert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gary Jennejohn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "Stevan Tiefert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 2:22 PM
> Subject: Re: X does not want to start
> > On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 12:04:36 +0200
> > "Stevan Tiefert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [snip script of Xorg start]
> > >
> > > I am using an ATI HD2600Pro, FreeBSD 7.2 and the release packages. Has
> > > somebody an idea?
> > >
> > /var/log/Xorg.0.log probably contains much more detailed information.
> > Are you using the ati or radeonhd(-devel) driver? radeonhd (which I'm
> > using) at least claims to support the HD2600Pro.
> I have no xorg.conf created. The X-Server is configuring himself. Here is
> the /var/log/Xorg.0.log:
> X.Org X Server 1.6.0
> Driver "ati"
OK, it's using the ati driver.
> (WW) RADEON(0): R600 support is mostly incomplete and very experimental
Hmm. The radeonhd driver supports this chip family (R600) better.
> (II) RADEON(0): Analog Display Input, Input Voltage Level: 0.700/0.300 V
What? This is an analog display but it's connected to DVI? Are you
using a DVI-to-VGA adapter?
I find it weird that Xorg seems to be finding the monitor on both DVI-0
> (II) RADEON(0): EDID vendor "AY_", prod id 765
> (II) RADEON(0): Output DVI-1 disconnected
> (II) RADEON(0): Output DVI-0 connected
> (II) RADEON(0): Using exact sizes for initial modes
> (EE) RADEON(0): Output DVI-0 enabled but has no modes
> after xf86InitialConfiguration
I'm not sure what this means, but in my experience it usually seems to
be because the driver can't find a suitable clock to use.
I'd delete the ati driver and try it with radeonhd myself.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Fw: X does not want to start Stevan Tiefert