|
Loading...
|
Canon-10D@yahoogroups.com
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
RE: [Canon-10D] Disappointed in the 5D mIII Paul D. DeRocco Sat Mar 03 10:02:01 2012
> From: gary.chris > > The D800 is $500 dollars less expensive and has 36+MP. Adding additional > MP, I thought, to the MkIII would be a no-brainer for the developers. I'd like to see some noise comparisons. The 36MP could look like confetti up close. I actually prefer my 10MP 40D to my 15MP 50D for that reason. -- Ciao, Paul D. DeRocco Paul mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [Canon-10D] Disappointed in the 5D mIII, (continued)
- Re: [Canon-10D] Disappointed in the 5D mIII Christian Kuiphoff 2012/03/03
- Re: [Canon-10D] Disappointed in the 5D mIII J Bryan Kramer 2012/03/03
- Re: [Canon-10D] Disappointed in the 5D mIII Christian Kuiphoff 2012/03/03
- Re: [Canon-10D] Disappointed in the 5D mIII Gary Udstrand 2012/03/03
- Re: [Canon-10D] Disappointed in the 5D mIII J Bryan Kramer 2012/03/03
- Re: [Canon-10D] Disappointed in the 5D mIII Debbi 2012/03/03
- Re: [Canon-10D] Disappointed in the 5D mIII John Posada 2012/03/03
- Re: [Canon-10D] Disappointed in the 5D mIII J Bryan Kramer 2012/03/03
- Re: [Canon-10D] Disappointed in the 5D mIII John Posada 2012/03/03
- Re: [Canon-10D] Disappointed in the 5D mIII John Posada 2012/03/03
- RE: [Canon-10D] Disappointed in the 5D mIII Paul D. DeRocco 2012/03/03 <=
- Re: [Canon-10D] Disappointed in the 5D mIII Christian Kuiphoff 2012/03/03
- Re: [Canon-10D] Disappointed in the 5D mIII Dwight Corrin 2012/03/03
- Re: [Canon-10D] Disappointed in the 5D mIII John P 2012/03/03
- [Canon-10D] Re: Disappointed in the 5D mIII Gil jackson CPP, CPS 2012/03/04