|
Loading...
|
Canon-10D@yahoogroups.com
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
Re: [Canon-10D] Re: Lens no Focus gary.chris Wed Apr 04 19:00:31 2012
I tried a version of your test and they were not conclusive because the angle of me standing and looking down, at an angle, at a yardstick and a book ( for the AF) vertical at the 20" point. I should have angled the book backwards a slight bit so to have a flat surface facing the lens. I took a photo using the auto focus first and 19" was in focus, not 20". I took another photo using manual focus and it was right on at 20". The lens I used was the 100-400 at 400mm f.5.6. The problem is that I am not quite sure where the point AF actually focus on. If it focused high up on the book, that would put it closer to me and 19" might be correct. I have to do it again and pay attention to the details. I'll get back to you guys. Thanks a lot - really helpful. Gary On 4/4/2012 1:35 PM, lvthunder1 wrote: > The best way to test it would be to do the following. Get a piece of grid or > lined paper and tape it to a box. Put it at about a 45 degree angle to your > camera on a tripod. Either use lights or window light and focus on the > center line. Then look at it on a computer and see where the focus is. To > tell if it's the camera or the lens the easiest way is to use a 2nd body. > Borrow one from a friend if you need to. > > Stephen Cupp > > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "gary.chris"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> This is an interesting thread because I am wondering if my 5D body is >> not focusing. Just doesn't seem like my shots are very sharp compared to >> ones taken a couple of months ago. >> >> I have used 2 "L" glass lenses and both have similar, just noticeable, >> 'lack-of-sharpness' in the shots. Could be my imagination, but I need to >> find out before I send the body in for repair. >> >> Can the auto-focus on the camera body have a problem? And how do you >> check it out? >> >> I am going to try to find a similar place I have taken photos before, >> but none are around here, so it might be a while before I can use that >> method. >> >> Gary >> >> On 4/3/2012 9:38 AM, Darrin J. Calcutt wrote: >>> What are the chances that my 18-200 IS F3.5 - 5.6 lens is outs of wack? >>> >>> I'm just not happy with the amount of pictures I take that are out of focus. >>> >>> Most of the ime I shot with one point of focus, and re-compose. >>> >>> Darrin
- [Canon-10D] Lens no Focus Darrin J. Calcutt 2012/04/03
- Re: [Canon-10D] Lens no Focus Jeremy Kezer 2012/04/03
- Re: [Canon-10D] Lens no Focus Bruce Ward 2012/04/03
- Re: [Canon-10D] Lens no Focus J Bryan Kramer 2012/04/03
- Re: [Canon-10D] Lens no Focus Darrin J. Calcutt 2012/04/03
- Re: [Canon-10D] Lens no Focus Tom 2012/04/03
- Re: [Canon-10D] Lens no Focus gary.chris 2012/04/03
- [Canon-10D] Re: Lens no Focus lvthunder1 2012/04/04
- Re: [Canon-10D] Re: Lens no Focus gary.chris 2012/04/04 <=
- Re: [Canon-10D] Re: Lens no Focus Bruce Ward 2012/04/05
- Re: [Canon-10D] Re: Lens no Focus Darrin J. Calcutt 2012/04/06
- Re: [Canon-10D] Re: Lens no Focus Bruce Ward 2012/04/06
- Re: [Canon-10D] Re: Lens no Focus John Posada 2012/04/06
- Re: [Canon-10D] Re: Lens no Focus gary . chris 2012/04/06
- Re: [Canon-10D] Re: Lens no Focus Darrin J. Calcutt 2012/04/11
- Re: [Canon-10D] Re: Lens no Focus J Bryan Kramer 2012/04/11
- Re: [Canon-10D] Re: Lens no Focus Darrin J. Calcutt 2012/04/11
- Re: [Canon-10D] Re: Lens no Focus J Bryan Kramer 2012/04/11
- [Canon-10D] Re: Lens no Focus Ian 2012/04/12