|
Loading...
|
SCT@yahoogroups.com
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
Re: [SCT] Re: Sidecar on a SWB /5? Robert Fleischer dba Fleischers Service Tue Jan 27 13:01:21 2009
----- Original Message ----- From: "Morg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 8:36 AM Subject: [SCT] Re: Sidecar on a SWB /5? > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Robert Fleischer dba Fleischers Service" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> No. >> Be sure your driveshaft bolts are the later shorter ones, use NO >> lockwashers, install with Loctite BLUE. >> You will need, of course, a proper subframe....and a cross-bar above > the >> battery (bolt-in is OK, if you have the tabs there that are unused). >> Some subframe ideas for an Airhead are on my website. >> 'bum >> > > Not trying to get into a spitting match but I ran 60K with no subframe > or cross bar. > > Suggested? - Yes > Required? - No > > Hackless in TN > > I want to discourage that idea, here & now,....as best I can. Not using a good and proper subframe on a BMW....and many other bikes....is a VERY bad idea, as you probably know...or should know. The BMW frames after 12/1969 are not designed to handle sidecar loads. They are much lighter gauge tubing, and there is little between-the-framerails support, if any. The UPPER of the rear frame (the rear frame is a separate item on most BMW's) is held to the front with two small bolts, and is flimsy for any load except up and down, and there is some question about THAT. Side support is nil. There is little support, left to right, on the main frame, for sideloads. Same at the steering head on early models. All is easily fixable....and not very expensively. It is partly due to the design, done for various reasons on purpose by BMW, that gives the 2-wheeler its famous Rubber Cow description. It is particularly onerous to mount a sidecar on the early models, such as the /5, without a truly proper subframe. BMW made incremental improvements many times to the frames...but NONE OF THESE FRAMES should be used without a subframe. You will put massive loads into the frame, which might actually BREAK....very dangerously. If used without a subframe, only a very light...and I mean LIGHT...sidecar should be used, even then not very safely on these early models. Further, if a frame does crack, it is not easy to properly fix, a simple welding job is NOT adequate....often the frame is simply ruined beyond economical repair. I VERY MUCH suggest that NO ONE use a BMW airhead frame without a subframe. I would even go so far as to advise folks to not purchase such a rig, or a bike that has had a sidecar so attached. I have actually seen broken BMW airhead frames (and have been sent photos of some others), from normal sidecar road use....not from off-roading or other abuse. With a proper subframe, such as the one Lowell Neff, and some others make, the Airhead is quite capable of even some moderate off-road use, and the main and rear frame will hold up to enormous mileages. snowbum
- [SCT] Sidecar on a SWB /5? bdwernychuk 2009/01/27
- Re: [SCT] Sidecar on a SWB /5? Robert Fleischer dba Fleischers Service 2009/01/27
- [SCT] Re: Sidecar on a SWB /5? Morg 2009/01/27
- [SCT] Re: Sidecar on a SWB /5? swaybar 2002 USCA#3563 2009/01/27
- [SCT] Re: Sidecar on a SWB /5? panheadphlox 2009/01/27
- Re: [SCT] Re: Sidecar on a SWB /5? Robert Fleischer dba Fleischers Service 2009/01/27 <=
- [SCT] Re: Sidecar on a SWB /5? bdwernychuk 2009/01/27
- Re: [SCT] Re: Sidecar on a SWB /5? Robert Fleischer dba Fleischers Service 2009/01/27
- Re: [SCT] Re: Sidecar on a SWB /5? Doug Long 2009/01/27
- RE: [SCT] Sidecar on a SWB /5? Steve Bergeron 2009/01/27