|
Loading...
|
alcoholicsanonymous@googlegroups.com
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
Re: anybody can be an addict, not everybody can be a drunk Blue Tue Feb 23 21:00:19 2010
Robert, I have a hard time doing anything you suggest I do, AA is attraction, not promotion... and I have to be frank here, You are not very attractive.... In fact, I find your rants impulsive... On Feb 23, 11:30 pm, "Rule #63" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 24, 1:58 pm, Blue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Feb 23, 9:16 pm, "Rule #63" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I'm truly grateful I don't qualify for AA membership. > > > > Bob > > > HA! Robert, you really don't know how to keep things simple do > > you..... honestly. > > Can't get much simpler than I did there, Blue > Any simpler and it would be simplistic, like your Tradition Three. > Maybe one day you will learn that the steps, and what Bill opined > about the steps, and the Traditions, and what Bill opined about the > Traditions, can be completely different things. > > I suggest you check out the history, where Dr Bob and the old timers > vigorously opposed them until Dr Bob, under intense pressure from Bill > relented while almost on his death bed. > > At the conference they were introduced, feeling was the Traditions > would be rejected if Bill proposed them, so they were put forward by a > nominee. > > > > > You are NOT an AA member anyway, you don't go to meetings, you don't > > contribute or support AA, so the traditions have nothing to do with > > you.... > > Other than I actually do occasionally contribute Geek stuff to local > AA, I've made no secret of that > > >of course you're going to trash the traditions...choosing not > > to be a part of is just killing you inside I'm sure. > > You wish, maybe > > Bob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Alcoholics Anonymous" group. To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/alcoholicsanonymous?hl=en.
- Re: Uninformed Judge, (continued)
- Re: Uninformed Judge Rule #63 2010/02/23
- Re: anybody can be an addict, not everybody can be a drunk Helen Fuller 2010/02/23
- Re: anybody can be an addict, not everybody can be a drunk mike t 2010/02/23
- Re: anybody can be an addict, not everybody can be a drunk Rule #63 2010/02/23
- Re: anybody can be an addict, not everybody can be a drunk Kathy Brown 2010/02/23
- Re: anybody can be an addict, not everybody can be a drunk Rule #63 2010/02/23
- Re: anybody can be an addict, not everybody can be a drunk Kathy Brown 2010/02/23
- Re: anybody can be an addict, not everybody can be a drunk Rule #63 2010/02/23
- Re: anybody can be an addict, not everybody can be a drunk Blue 2010/02/23
- Re: anybody can be an addict, not everybody can be a drunk Rule #63 2010/02/23
- Re: anybody can be an addict, not everybody can be a drunk Blue 2010/02/23 <=
- Re: anybody can be an addict, not everybody can be a drunk Anne Mcneill 2010/02/24
- Re: anybody can be an addict, not everybody can be a drunk Murph 2010/02/24
- Murph stated I'd like to call for a group conscience, and so would I. Is that a motion and a second Jim Vaughn 2010/02/25
- Re: Murph stated I'd like to call for a group conscience, and so would I. Is that a motion and a second mike t 2010/02/25
- Re: Murph stated I'd like to call for a group conscience, and so would I. Is that a motion and a second Rule #63 2010/02/25
- Re: Murph stated I'd like to call for a group conscience, and so would I. Is that a motion and a second Rule #63 2010/02/25
- Re: Murph stated I'd like to call for a group conscience, and so would I. Is that a motion and a second Blue 2010/02/25
- need help Jim Vaughn 2010/02/25
- Re: Murph stated I'd like to call for a group conscience, and so would I. Is that a motion and a second Rule #63 2010/02/25
- Re: anybody can be an addict, not everybody can be a drunk JD 2010/02/25