|
Loading...
|
alcoholicsanonymous@googlegroups.com
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
need help Jim Vaughn Thu Feb 25 08:00:03 2010
Blue the correct action at this time is AA centered and has nothing to do with this group. I f you want the name of a good group with support, good esh, long term sobriety and new comers, feel free to contact me. I just noticed your email address. jimv ________________________________ From: Blue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Alcoholics Anonymous <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thu, February 25, 2010 8:50:33 AM Subject: Re: Murph stated I'd like to call for a group conscience, and so would I. Is that a motion and a second Bob, I was crying in my beer and I had no ideal what AA was, I thought you guys were going to tell me how to control my drinking, Now that I'm sober and I'm a member of AA, I suppose deleting this group is the best thing to do ? I reached out to AA because I didn't know what else to do, I wanted to kill myself at that time. I didn't think what I did was going to be label me as doing something reprehensible. But reaching out to AA only to be labled has doing something reprehensible, really hurts me... I didn't do anything wrong. You can read here: http://groups.google.ca/group/alcoholicsanonymous/browse_frm/month/2004-11?hl=en how this group started, I asked for help. In the last 7 years or so, every single moderator banned you from this group Bob, I guess everyone is wrong and you're right. If you guys want me to delete this group, then just let me know and I'll do it. On Feb 25, 8:53 am, "Rule #63" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 25, 11:04 pm, mike t <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > It was Blue who asked for a group conscience. > > > Frankly I don't see why everyone is so distraught over Bob. I don't > > see Bob as anti-AA, only anti-rituals and anti-worship. He raises > > valid questions that everyone should consider. AA didn't start out as > > ritualized and convoluted as it has become today, where the primary > > message and primary purposes have become so muddled and watered down > > with other addictions or political correctness. As rough as Bob is > > around the edges, I believe he is banging on the drum of the original > > message of AA, not modern AA's message. That has the effect of > > rustling many people's feathers because it isn't the feel-good, > > everything-will-be-okay-if-you-just-don't-drink pablum prevalent in > > meetings today. > > > If you can't handle what's written just delete it or change your own > > outlook. Insisting someone else conform to us is not what AA has > > taught me. > > > mike t. > > What seems the wisest decision those with control issues ever made in > this Google forum was to move to IIRC,http://www.friendsofbillw.ca > > If you check the link > below:-http://groups.google.com.au/group/alcoholicsanonymous/about?hl=en > > A hiatus is evident between April, and August, 2009 > There was a post explaining the group had moved, but the current owner > of this group apparently utilizes the power of deletion more liberally > than I would expect, but I've no problem whatsoever with the owner of > this group not being caged inside my expectations. > > Repeatedly, without nagging, I've expressed my opinion that a > privately owned group masquerading as Alcoholics Anonymous is > reprehensible, and the current disclaimer, "This group is not > affiliated with any sect, denomination, politics, organization or > institution; does not wish to engage in any controversy, neither > endorses nor opposes any causes. Our primary purpose is to stay sober > and help other alcoholics still suffering from alcoholism achieve > sobriety." is plagiarized, unconscionably, from the real Alcoholics > Anonymous. > > People bleating on about AA Traditions here, where the only > requirement for membership is an account ceding archived material to > Google, and anyone can join, is one of the most illustrious examples > of irony I've seen this century. > > Nevertheless, starting from that first, "Just For Today" card, where I > started to appreciate I could clarify and utilize my thinking, I have > gained both experience of, and knowledge (not to forget opinions ;-) > regarding, recovery from alcoholism! > > Despite my misgivings about the very existence of this group, reality > is that the group is here, and reality is I believe I do have > Experience, Strength, and Hope, in abundance, that I am still willing > to share. > > Bob > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 07:53, Jim Vaughn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Here is a pattern, Chris asks for a group conscience, I responded with > > > what > > > I feel were valid questions, the kind you here in AA biz or group > > > conscience > > > meetings, Blue had questions. > > > > Bob managed to come up with his usual bs babble. So where did the request > > > go. If you were new could you have gotten sober here. I for one don't mind > > > some opinion and questions, but I would hate to be new here. > > > > Are you bob a sober member of AA, you talk like you hate AA, and you have > > > the correct way. I would say that to your face in a f2f meeting of AA any > > > day. > > > > I know in the real world this shit wouldn't last a > > > f...ing minute............. If you have people leaving here, the question > > > is > > > why. Just went through this at another group. Here is whats always said > > > just > > > delete them or me or do something.....jimv- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Alcoholics Anonymous" group. To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/alcoholicsanonymous?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Alcoholics Anonymous" group. To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/alcoholicsanonymous?hl=en.
- Re: anybody can be an addict, not everybody can be a drunk, (continued)
- Re: anybody can be an addict, not everybody can be a drunk Blue 2010/02/23
- Re: anybody can be an addict, not everybody can be a drunk Rule #63 2010/02/23
- Re: anybody can be an addict, not everybody can be a drunk Blue 2010/02/23
- Re: anybody can be an addict, not everybody can be a drunk Anne Mcneill 2010/02/24
- Re: anybody can be an addict, not everybody can be a drunk Murph 2010/02/24
- Murph stated I'd like to call for a group conscience, and so would I. Is that a motion and a second Jim Vaughn 2010/02/25
- Re: Murph stated I'd like to call for a group conscience, and so would I. Is that a motion and a second mike t 2010/02/25
- Re: Murph stated I'd like to call for a group conscience, and so would I. Is that a motion and a second Rule #63 2010/02/25
- Re: Murph stated I'd like to call for a group conscience, and so would I. Is that a motion and a second Rule #63 2010/02/25
- Re: Murph stated I'd like to call for a group conscience, and so would I. Is that a motion and a second Blue 2010/02/25
- need help Jim Vaughn 2010/02/25 <=
- Re: Murph stated I'd like to call for a group conscience, and so would I. Is that a motion and a second Rule #63 2010/02/25
- Re: anybody can be an addict, not everybody can be a drunk JD 2010/02/25
- Re: anybody can be an addict, not everybody can be a drunk JD 2010/02/25
- Re: anybody can be an addict, not everybody can be a drunk Helen Fuller 2010/02/22
- Re: anybody can be an addict, not everybody can be a drunk mike t 2010/02/22
- 2 hats Jim Vaughn 2010/02/22
- Re: Hi all. mike t 2010/02/21
- Re: Hi all. Helen Fuller 2010/02/21
- Re: Hi all. mike t 2010/02/21
- How it happened....just my thought Jim Vaughn 2010/02/21