Re: Categories and fixed="yes"

Bill de hOra wrote:
> James M Snell wrote:
>
> > The categories element should be interpreted as only applying to the
> > "http://example.org/extra-cats/" scheme.  
>
> There's no reasonable reading of the RFC that supports that.

To be clear - the scheme attribute exists solely so child category 
elements without schemes can acquire it. It has no stated relation to 
fixed, which is relative to the Collection.

cheers
Bill