Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00

Nikunj R. Mehta wrote:
> On May 20, 2009, at 11:24 AM, Peter Keane wrote:
>
> > Also, looks like IANA Atom Link registry already includes "up."  This
> > ID is simply reusing that, correct?
>
> That is correct.

And a good thing; that being said we should make that explicit in the 
IANA Considerations Section.

In addition, it would be good to rephrase "Description:" part of these 
so that they become generic, and not tied to Atom.

And, as a nit, the "Security considerations:" shouldn't say "this 
draft", as it won't be a draft anymore when it gets published :-).

BR, Julian