|
Loading...
|
bcintbird-pics@googlegroups.com
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
bcintbird-pics Colour factors and moult - delete now if you have had enough of Grosbeaks M Lancaster Tue Feb 21 01:01:25 2012
OK - moult and 'red feathers'. It is perfectly possible to have red, yellow, shades of red, shades of yellow, and feathers with red and yellow in them ALL as part of the same moult, OR, indeed, feathers without any of the said colours. Hence for example, black or grey feathers in the Pine Grosbeak. Firstly, the red/yellow complex ( in most species of birds) is derived from eating foods containing precursors to aforesaid red/yellow complex. Secondly, feathers are moulted feather tract by feather tract. Thirdly, each tract is programmed to produce feathers of a certain type and colour. Fourthly, growing feathers takes time. So, even if a feather tract was supposed to 'turn' red, if the bird did not have access to precursors, or have a store in the body (see below (1)) feathers could be of different colours and especially those that take weeks to grow, could even exhibit differences of shade or even absence (of colour) in the same feather. Normally, apparently bizarre appearances would not occur of course - but it is possible. Then, one has to consider sex (gender not act). Female Grosbeaks do not normally appear red (if at all?) so they are eating the same precursors as the males and not (I guess!!!!) having the same 'magic ingredient' as males (that produce red) and only produce yellow (or shades thereof and occasionally reddish - 'bronze' is a term used - see below (2)). That said, it is perfectly possible for a male to have yellow(ish) feathers in varying amounts and especially if it is a young male - indeed the common consensus is that first year (of LIFE) Pine Grosbeaks look like females yet in the second year (of LIFE) therefore 1/2 calendar and 2/3 calendar years they appear as 'males'. What is more, generally speaking the amount and intensity of 'redness' does increase somewhat as male birds age ( and I have speculated this could occur with females also). OK now for the difficult stuff :-), and another species (or species). For about 25 years I was an aviculturalist and associated with others who bred many different species of birds in captivity - I mainly confined myself to psittacines. However, by association and research and post mortem I learned a few things about 'colour fed' birds and indeed at one time I was breeding the ubiquitous House Finch. Colour has a major impact on the so called 'Red factor' Canaries which arose as the result of a hybridisation between the Canary (Serinus canaria - yes, from the Canary Islands) and the Red Siskin (Carduelis cucullata) from South America. Canaries without Red Siskin genes and without access to natural foods or manufactured 'red colourants' cannot produce red feathers - yellow, yes, because that process is part of the original Canary gene package. Hence, the average perception that Canaries are yellow - sorry folks, not wild ones. House Finches kept in captivity also need access to natural foods or 'red colourants' before males will exhibit red feathers. NB females eating food or drinking water containing 'red colourants' do not have red feathers. It is perfectly possible to see House Finches in the wild with yellow feathers where red should be. If my experience with captive House Finches is worth anything, these are probably birds in their second calendar year. Now, nobody seems to know just how much (colour)-food or how much powder should be added to food or drink in order to facilitate a red appearance of Canaries. This must be provided before and during the period of moult.Too much colourant results in the appearance of what is termed 'burnt' birds which are a reddish bronze in colour ( see above 2). Such birds can and do produce red feathers in a succeeding moult (or moults ??) as the result of the 'red colourant' being stored in fat - post mortem shows birds with bright red fat (see 1 above). I doubt if this occurs in the wild. So, given the right or wrong conditions almost anything can, and does happen - ain't nature wonderful? For those who have not had enough of this subject, I suggest one 'Googles' Carophyll Red - there is also a Carophyll Yellow. Also 'Google' carotenoids - Birds of North America offers a short discourse pertinent to Pine Grosbeaks. Barry M B Lancaster, Currently - Tenerife, Islas Canarias ----- Original Message ----- From: Rick Howie To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 1:07 AM Subject: RE: bcintbird-pics grosbeak identification High again Phil. It is a curious phenomenon in that by the time this bird had moulted in all of those red feathers, the rump feathering should have followed suit as the molt is normally complete. It appears as if there can be aberrant individuals whereby some feathers forgot to fly away and make room for the new inbound ones. A constant reminder that nature retains the right to variation for whatever reasons and purposes. 'tis perhaps only humans that make rules and then expect everybody and everything to obey them. Perhaps Barry can enucleate the reason for such variation which we shall entitle " Lancaster's Molt Parable." Rick Howie From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Phil Ranson Sent: February-20-12 1:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: bcintbird-pics grosbeak identification I haven't been following the particulars of this discussion, but thought I'd throw in a recently taken photo by Rod Sargent at Baker Creek west of Quesnel. He was intrigued by the mustard rump on an otherwise typical adult male plumage. Phil Ranson Williams Lake -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BCs Interesting Bird and Nature Pictures" group. To post to this group, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bcintbird-pics?hl=en-GB. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BCs Interesting Bird and Nature Pictures" group. To post to this group, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bcintbird-pics?hl=en-GB. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BCs Interesting Bird and Nature Pictures" group. To post to this group, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bcintbird-pics?hl=en-GB.
- Re: bcintbird-pics grosbeak identification, (continued)
- Re: bcintbird-pics grosbeak identification M Lancaster 2012/02/20
- RE: bcintbird-pics grosbeak identification Rick Howie 2012/02/20
- Re: bcintbird-pics grosbeak identification Alistair Fraser 2012/02/20
- Re: bcintbird-pics grosbeak identification M Lancaster 2012/02/20
- RE: bcintbird-pics grosbeak identification Rick Howie 2012/02/20
- Re: bcintbird-pics grosbeak identification M Lancaster 2012/02/20
- RE: bcintbird-pics grosbeak identification Dick Cannings 2012/02/20
- Re: bcintbird-pics grosbeak identification Phil Ranson 2012/02/20
- RE: bcintbird-pics grosbeak identification Rick Howie 2012/02/20
- RE: bcintbird-pics grosbeak identification Rick Howie 2012/02/20
- bcintbird-pics Colour factors and moult - delete now if you have had enough of Grosbeaks M Lancaster 2012/02/21 <=
- RE: bcintbird-pics Colour factors and moult - delete now if you have had enough of Grosbeaks Rick Howie 2012/02/21
- Re: bcintbird-pics grosbeak identification M Lancaster 2012/02/21
- Re: bcintbird-pics grosbeak identification - a thorough work M Lancaster 2012/02/20