Re: Bringing Cactus Back To Life

On 01/02/07, Magnus Grimsell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Petar,
>
> Great work! It would be good if we could commit this to the apache
repository as quick as possible.
> I have already started making a patch on the new maven2 built code base.
> I needed to make a fix on CactifyEarTask that was dependent on Cargo
0.9-SNAPSHOT.
> What do we need to do to commit Petars work?
> Can I help in any way?
>
> Regards,
> Magnus Grimsell
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Petar Tahchiev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 4:27 PM
> > To: Cactus Developers List
> > Subject: Re: Bringing Cactus Back To Life
> >
> >
> > On 29/01/07, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Petar Tahchiev wrote:
> > > > Hi gyus,
> > > >
> > > > So to summon up the situation is this:I understand that
> > there is still
> > > lots
> > > > of work to be done, but I definitely think that we are on
> > the right way.
> > > > If any of the cactus-committers is able to look at the
> > source tree in
> > > [2]
> > > > and give his feedback if it is good
> > > > enough to port it (maybe as a branch at first) on the
> > cactus official
> > > repo.
> > > > So we can all continue working on it. Also it would be good
> > > > to hear from you, what else could be done for the
> > successful release of
> > > the
> > > > of Cactus-1.8 project - this project definitely deserves our
> > > > joint efforts for bringing it to life again.
> > >
> > > I am in favor of moving things back to Apache, too bad the
> > refactor wasn't
> > > done here to begin with
> > > though. The consequence of this is, that the changes need
> > to come through
> > > the incubator. Which means :
> > >
> > > - A code grant for the code to be moved here.
> > > - Gettings CLA's on file
> > > - Start a vote to accept the code.
> > > - Start a vote to get Petar on board as a committer.
> > >
> > > The first 3 is to make sure that everything is covered legally.
> > >
> > > Mvgr,
> > > Martin
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> > Martin hello,
> >
> > Yes it would be nice to bring the code back in the apache
> > organization, but
> > I am totally unaware what is expected of me. I mean if there
> > is anything I
> > have to do for the code to be brought back in the official repository,
> > please let me know.
> >
> > --
> > Regards, Petar!
> > Karlovo, Bulgaria.
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Magnus hi,

I  submitted a patch about the cactus-m2 integration in the jira, but it is
really outdated.

Please consider checking out the latest from the sourceforge repository:

svn co https://mamouth.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/mamouth/Cactuscactus-trunk

I think that the Cargo-0.9-SNAPSHOT dependency is needed - as the cactus-ant

integration is refactored to use some of the cargo classes (like WebXml.java,
EjbRef.java, etc).
But I spoke with the cargo guys, and they said that cargo would be released
soon. So I think that
this won't be a big problem.

--
Regards, Petar!
Karlovo, Bulgaria.