[cfwheels] Re: Reloading w/ active connections

I looks like Railo is not seeing that the application scope is
unlocked and so the request waits for 180s before timing out. Don't
quote me on this, it's just a first guess.

James

On Jan 31, 2:23 pm, John C Bland II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Using Railo 3.2 on Tomcat 6 through Apache by way of AJP. :-D #mouthful
>
> It never lasts the whole request timeout length. I set it to 3 minutes but it 
> takes less than 15s.
>
> requesttimeout.log
> "ERROR","web-0","01/31/2011","13:59:13","controler","stop thread (27) because 
> run into a timeout path: 
> /var/www/vhosts/mysite/subdomains/dev/httpdocs/rewrite.cfm 
> (/var/www/vhosts/mysite/subdomains/dev/httpdocs/controllers/Controller.cfc) . 
> open locks (wheelsreloadlock)"
>
> Error email (partial):
> there is a timeout occurred on a exclusive lock with name [wheelsReloadLock] 
> after 180 seconds
>
> catalina.out
> Mon Jan 31 13:59:10 EST 2011-144 Release: (78)
> - I/O exception (java.net.ConnectException) caught when processing request: 
> Connection timed out
> - Retrying request
>
> On Jan 31, 2011, at 9:56 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Couple of questions John:
>
> > 1. How long does the reload take?
> > 2. Are you using railo or cf9?
>
> > We are running cf9 and can easily do 60 rpm during the day and have
> > never run into this issue. All other requests should wait for the lock
> > to end so the only reason that the timeouts would occur would be if
> > the timeout is set too low.
>
> > James
>
> > On Jan 31, 10:16 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I would not recommend removing the lock. I would recommend setting the
> >> timeout higher.
>
> >> James
>
> >> On Jan 31, 7:08 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>> is there a way you can post the actual error from your coldfusion
> >>> error logs?
>
> >>> On Jan 31, 12:30 am, "John C. Bland II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>> wrote:
>
> >>>> Cool thought but not going to fix my issue anytime soon. [not being rude
> >>>> just annoyed w/ this one]
>
> >>>> Any thoughts for immediate fixes?
>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> John C. Bland II
> >>>> Blog:http://www.johncblandii.com
> >>>> Company:http://www.katapultmedia.com
> >>>> Twitter: @johncblandii
>
> >>>> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 8:43 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL 
> >>>> PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> >>>>> screwed up that bit of code :)
> >>>>> should read:
>
> >>>>> <cfif SturctKeyExist( URL, "reset" )>
> >>>>>     <cflock scope="application" timeout="10">
> >>>>>         <cfset THIS.OnApplicationStart() />
> >>>>>    </cflock>
> >>>>> </cfif>
>
> >>>>> On Jan 30, 9:41 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>>> i've often wondered if we really even need to have the
> >>>>>> wheelsReloadLock. In the old days, to reload an application, it was
> >>>>>> custom to add the following into the onrequeststart() in the
> >>>>>> application.cfm
>
> >>>>>> <cflock scope="application" timeout="10">
> >>>>>>         <cfif SturctKeyExist( URL, "reset" )>
> >>>>>>             <cfset THIS.OnApplicationStart() />
> >>>>>>         </cfif>
> >>>>>> </cflock>
>
> >>>>>> i'm wondering if getting rid of all the wheelsReloadLock and just
> >>>>>> scope locking the onapplicationstart call in wheels/event/
> >>>>>> onrequeststart.cfm would be enough?
>
> >>>>>> On Jan 30, 8:41 pm, "John C. Bland II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>> I'm seeing some problems reloading w/ active site connections.
>
> >>>>>>> Steps:
> >>>>>>> 1) Reload
> >>>>>>> 2) Hit a different page while reload is happening
> >>>>>>> 3) wheelsReloadLock timeout
>
> >>>>>>> Any ideas? For sites that aren't high traffic this isn't a problem but
> >>>>> sites
> >>>>>>> with a lot of active users, ajax refreshes, etc I'm seeing some major
> >>>>> issues
> >>>>>>> w/ this and restarting Railo/Tomcat isn't going to cut it.
>
> >>>>>>> ---
> >>>>>>> John C. Bland II
> >>>>>>> Blog:http://www.johncblandii.com
> >>>>>>> Company:http://www.katapultmedia.com
> >>>>>>> Twitter: @johncblandii
>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> >>>>> Groups
> >>>>> "ColdFusion on Wheels" group.
> >>>>> To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED] om>
> >>>>> .
> >>>>> For more options, visit this group at
> >>>>>http://groups.google.com/group/cfwheels?hl=en.
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > "ColdFusion on Wheels" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For more options, visit this group 
> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/cfwheels?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ColdFusion on Wheels" group.
To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cfwheels?hl=en.