|
Loading...
|
cfwheels@googlegroups.com
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
[cfwheels] Re: Closest PHP Equivalent to Wheels Brad Fri Jul 29 19:01:19 2011
Here is a good Comparison of Web application frameworks http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Web_application_frameworks#PHP_2. On Jul 29, 11:02 am, dcolumbus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I digress in behalf of us all. Originally I pointed to 3 main features > that would heavy-handedly point to a proper PHP equivalent. So far in > my findings between CI and Cake: > > 1) Easy Install: Tied > 2) ORM functions: Cake takes the "cake" on this one. > 3) Documentation: CI has pretty good docs. And although I've seen > complaints about the lack of documentation for Cake, it seems they > have improved. > > John is going to help me out with a screencast so I can get right to > the core of CI. :) > > On Jul 29, 10:54 am, Ryan LeTulle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > @brad > > impressive set of tutorials, thanks for that link > > > @john > > I agree with you > > * > > > Ryan LeTulle* > > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Ryan LeTulle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I like Code Igniter as well even if I don't personally find it very > > > similar > > > to Wheels or Rails. > > > * > > > > Ryan LeTulle* > > > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Brad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> I personal like CI in my search for a PHP equivalent. I find that the > > >> structure and flow are very similar. Here is a great series > > >> “CodeIgniter From Scratch” > > >>http://net.tutsplus.com/sessions/codeigniter-from-scratch/ > > >> should you decide to go with CI. Good luck… > > > >> On Jul 28, 11:05 pm, dcolumbus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > All, > > > >> > From what I see, the simplicity and "auto-ness" that Wheels provides, > > >> > Cake seems to as well. Take a look at this comparison between CI and > > >> > Cake: > > > >> >http://snook.ca/archives/php/codeigniter_vs_cakephp > > > >> > Thoughts? > > > >> > On Jul 28, 9:25 pm, dcolumbus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> > > @John, > > > >> > > That's extremely gracious of you to offer that. I think I'll take you > > >> > > up on the screenshare. > > > >> > > On Jul 28, 9:16 pm, John C Bland II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> > > > CI has a great community, docs are awesome, and plenty of details > > >> online. > > > >> > > > Ping me whenever if you hit a snag or want to screenshare a > > >> > > > rundown. > > >> I can show the comparisons/contrasts between the two. > > > >> > > > On Jul 28, 2011, at 11:15 PM, dcolumbus wrote: > > > >> > > > > @John, > > > >> > > > > That's what I need. The transition back and forth should be as > > >> > > > > painless as possible. > > > >> > > > > How well supported is CI? > > > >> > > > > On Jul 28, 8:49 pm, John C Bland II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > >> +1 for CI. > > > >> > > > >> Because I knew CI, Wheels came easy. > > > >> > > > >> On Jul 28, 2011, at 9:20 PM, Chris Peters wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> I've heard several times that CodeIgnitor is pretty darn close > > >> in terms of "how it feels": > > >> > > > >>>http://codeigniter.com/ > > > >> > > > >>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:14 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] < > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > > > >>> cakephp, symphony and if you're really brave... zend > > > >> > > > >>> On Jul 28, 10:10 pm, Andrew Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > > > >>>> CakePHP maybe? http://cakephp.org > > > >> > > > >>>> On 29 July 2011 11:24, dcolumbus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>>>> As I've said many times before, Wheels is the absolute best > > >> Framework > > >> > > > >>>>> I've ever used ... sadly thought, it's not always possible to > > >> develop > > >> > > > >>>>> in CF. > > > >> > > > >>>>> For those times when I have to use PHP, I'm wondering what > > >> > > > >>>>> the > > >> closest > > >> > > > >>>>> PHP option is. > > > >> > > > >>>>> Some of the features I love about Wheels and would love about > > >> a PHP > > >> > > > >>>>> alternative are: > > > >> > > > >>>>> 1) Easy Install ... just being able to drag the Wheels > > >> > > > >>>>> project > > >> into a > > >> > > > >>>>> folder is snap. A couple of options later, and you're done! > > >> > > > >>>>> 2) ORM functions ... The fact that Wheels leverages powerful > > >> ORM > > >> > > > >>>>> capabilities means that DB transactions are a snap. > > >> > > > >>>>> 3) Documentation ... Wheels has some of the best > > >> > > > >>>>> documentation > > >> ever. > > > >> > > > >>>>> Thanks guys! > > > >> > > > >>>>> -- > > >> > > > >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the > > >> Google Groups > > >> > > > >>>>> "ColdFusion on Wheels" group. > > >> > > > >>>>> To post to this group, send email to > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > > > >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > >> > > > >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > > > >>>>> For more options, visit this group at > > >> > > > >>>>>http://groups.google.com/group/cfwheels?hl=en. > > > >> > > > >>> -- > > >> > > > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the > > >> Google Groups "ColdFusion on Wheels" group. > > >> > > > >>> To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > > > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > > > >>> For more options, visit this group athttp:// > > >> groups.google.com/group/cfwheels?hl=en. > > > >> > > > >>> -- > > >> > > > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the > > >> Google Groups "ColdFusion on Wheels" group. > > >> > > > >>> To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > > > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > > > >>> For more options, visit this group athttp:// > > >> groups.google.com/group/cfwheels?hl=en. > > > >> > > > > -- > > >> > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the > > >> > > > > Google > > >> Groups "ColdFusion on Wheels" group. > > >> > > > > To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > > > > For more options, visit this group athttp:// > > >> groups.google.com/group/cfwheels?hl=en. > > > >> -- > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > >> "ColdFusion on Wheels" group. > > >> To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> For more options, visit this group at > > >>http://groups.google.com/group/cfwheels?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ColdFusion on Wheels" group. To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfwheels?hl=en.
- Re: [cfwheels] Re: Closest PHP Equivalent to Wheels, (continued)
- Re: [cfwheels] Re: Closest PHP Equivalent to Wheels John C Bland II 2011/07/29
- [cfwheels] Re: Closest PHP Equivalent to Wheels dcolumbus 2011/07/29
- Re: [cfwheels] Re: Closest PHP Equivalent to Wheels John C Bland II 2011/07/29
- [cfwheels] Re: Closest PHP Equivalent to Wheels dcolumbus 2011/07/29
- [cfwheels] Re: Closest PHP Equivalent to Wheels dcolumbus 2011/07/29
- [cfwheels] Re: Closest PHP Equivalent to Wheels Brad 2011/07/29
- Re: [cfwheels] Re: Closest PHP Equivalent to Wheels Ryan LeTulle 2011/07/29
- Re: [cfwheels] Re: Closest PHP Equivalent to Wheels John C Bland II 2011/07/29
- Re: [cfwheels] Re: Closest PHP Equivalent to Wheels Ryan LeTulle 2011/07/29
- [cfwheels] Re: Closest PHP Equivalent to Wheels dcolumbus 2011/07/29
- [cfwheels] Re: Closest PHP Equivalent to Wheels Brad 2011/07/29 <=
Re: [cfwheels] Closest PHP Equivalent to Wheels Brad Gunn 2011/07/29