|
Loading...
|
clamav-devel@lists.clamav.net
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
Re: [Clamav-devel] bad signatures? Török Edvin Mon Jan 01 12:10:29 2007
On 1/1/07, Amir Goldor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Hi, please see this thread: http://lurker.clamav.net/message/20061030.185430.688d1f47.en.html
I think there is a bug in the cli_ac_addpatt() function. in my kernel module version of clamav, I check for wildcard characters
Is it based on 0.88.x? 0.90 has an improved ac engine.
there are 2 examples I found in the clamav db for signatures that have a wildcard character as the 2nd bytes of the pattern:
TK said (in that thread) range wildcards (*,{})). "(59|79)" is not a
range wildcard.
Trojan.Bat.DeltreeY-3:0:*:...{-1}2f(59|79)...
Trojan.IRC-Script-28:0:*:6e??...
Should work in 0.90rc. Tomasz: please correct me if I am wrong. Best regards, Edwin _______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html
- [Clamav-devel] bad signatures? Amir Goldor 2007/01/01
- Re: [Clamav-devel] bad signatures? Török Edvin 2007/01/01 <=
- Re: [Clamav-devel] bad signatures? Amir Goldor 2007/01/03
- Re: [Clamav-devel] bad signatures? Török Edvin 2007/01/04
- Re: [Clamav-devel] bad signatures? Amir Goldor 2007/01/02