RE: [coyotos-dev] Scheduler design

On Sun, 2006-03-26 at 03:08 +0200, Valerio Bellizzomi wrote:

> I agree. But memory tests are very sensitive to timings. It is very likely
> that in presence of preemption the memory test reports false alarms or miss
> faulty bits. This is the main issue for IMT right now.

Doing this particular test right requires access to physical addresses.
It doesn't want to run under an OS.

_______________________________________________
coyotos-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/coyotos-dev