|
Loading...
|
dev@ant.apache.org
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
Re: NIO 2.0 == Ant 2.0? was Re: Java NIO support Nicolas Lalevée Thu Feb 16 15:00:46 2012
Le 16 févr. 2012 à 20:47, Bruce Atherton a écrit : > I'd hope to go further than that in backwards compatibility. I work with a > lot of companies that are: > > a) resistant to learning new things unless there is a good reason for it > (such as the migration from Apache HTTP Server from 1.x to 2.x to resolve > security issues) > > b) have a number of separate Ant build scripts that follow different > standards in different areas of the company, particularly if they have > > and c) need to have a justification to allocate resources to upgrade and > change a working build to use new features, which standardizing builds across > the organization using new features in a major release that simplify the > build system may offer them. I don't know conclusion you're having there. Such companies shouldn't worry about any new major version, because they actually do want to stick with the old one for stability purpose. I guess that the companies which would be troubled is the ones which want to keep up with the releases, migrations from one version to another should not be too painful. > You are right about the plugin parser architecture in Ant 1.x, but one of the > problems with it is that there is nothing shipped by default. What I meant > was that I would love it if Ant 2 also represented a point where new builds > could think about using a new build format automatically, just based on file > extension or a flag on the command line. That might encourage new projects to > adopt it. Well, again, I think it's already there, no need to wait for an Ant 2.0 :) If you add the groovy-front.jar in Ant's boot classpath, write a build.groovy, then a launch of ant with no parameter on the command line will execute your groovy build script. See ProjectHelperRepository.getProjectHelperForBuildFile(Resource) Nicolas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: NIO 2.0 == Ant 2.0? was Re: Java NIO support, (continued)
- Re: NIO 2.0 == Ant 2.0? was Re: Java NIO support Mansour Al Akeel 2012/02/16
- Re: NIO 2.0 == Ant 2.0? was Re: Java NIO support Steele, Richard 2012/02/16
- Re: NIO 2.0 == Ant 2.0? was Re: Java NIO support Nicolas Lalevée 2012/02/16
- Re: NIO 2.0 == Ant 2.0? was Re: Java NIO support Jeffrey E Care 2012/02/13
- Re: NIO 2.0 == Ant 2.0? was Re: Java NIO support Stefan Bodewig 2012/02/14
- Re: NIO 2.0 == Ant 2.0? was Re: Java NIO support Matt Benson 2012/02/14
- Re: NIO 2.0 == Ant 2.0? was Re: Java NIO support Bruce Atherton 2012/02/14
- Re: NIO 2.0 == Ant 2.0? was Re: Java NIO support Nicolas Lalevée 2012/02/16
- Re: NIO 2.0 == Ant 2.0? was Re: Java NIO support Bruce Atherton 2012/02/16
- Re: NIO 2.0 == Ant 2.0? was Re: Java NIO support Bruce Atherton 2012/02/16
- Re: NIO 2.0 == Ant 2.0? was Re: Java NIO support Nicolas Lalevée 2012/02/16 <=
- Re: NIO 2.0 == Ant 2.0? was Re: Java NIO support Bruce Atherton 2012/02/16
- Re: NIO 2.0 == Ant 2.0? was Re: Java NIO support Dominique Devienne 2012/02/17
- Re: NIO 2.0 == Ant 2.0? was Re: Java NIO support Bruce Atherton 2012/02/17
- Re: NIO 2.0 == Ant 2.0? was Re: Java NIO support Gilles Scokart 2012/02/18
- Ant 2 design (was Re: NIO 2.0 == Ant 2.0?) Bruce Atherton 2012/02/18
- Re: Ant 2 design (was Re: NIO 2.0 == Ant 2.0?) Mansour Al Akeel 2012/02/18
- Re: Ant 2 design (was Re: NIO 2.0 == Ant 2.0?) Bruce Atherton 2012/02/18
- Re: Ant 2 design (was Re: NIO 2.0 == Ant 2.0?) Mansour Al Akeel 2012/02/18
- Re: Ant 2 design (was Re: NIO 2.0 == Ant 2.0?) Bruce Atherton 2012/02/18
- Re: Ant 2 design (was Re: NIO 2.0 == Ant 2.0?) Mansour Al Akeel 2012/02/18