|
Loading...
|
dev@struts.apache.org
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
Re: name inconsistency David Durham, Jr. Thu Jun 14 12:02:44 2007
On 6/13/07, Rene Gielen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I personally personally find the combination of <s:set name="foo" value="..." /> <s:textfield name="foo" /> a veeery common usecase. That said, I would be quite confused to have to write <s:set id="foo" value="..." /> <s:textfield name="foo" /> instead in future. Anyway, thanks for setting the ticket on hold for now - maybe we manage to get some more opinions in to bring any possible decision on that topic to a broad base.
Adding another user perspective, I agree with Rene that 'id' should be used in the XML sense of id and should be unique within a document. As I see things, an id should refer to the document element itself within it's original context. Isn't this the reason for a styleId attribute in struts 1? -Dave --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- name inconsistency Musachy Barroso 2007/06/12
- Re: name inconsistency Rene Gielen 2007/06/13
- RE: name inconsistency Al Sutton 2007/06/13
- Re: name inconsistency Musachy Barroso 2007/06/13
- RE: name inconsistency Rene Gielen 2007/06/13
- Re: name inconsistency Musachy Barroso 2007/06/13
- Re: name inconsistency Rene Gielen 2007/06/13
- Re: name inconsistency David Durham, Jr. 2007/06/14 <=
- Re: name inconsistency Musachy Barroso 2007/06/14
- Re: name inconsistency Musachy Barroso 2007/06/14
- Re: name inconsistency Musachy Barroso 2007/06/14
- Re: name inconsistency David Durham, Jr. 2007/06/14
- Re: name inconsistency Martin Cooper 2007/06/18
- Re: name inconsistency Musachy Barroso 2007/06/18
- Re: name inconsistency Musachy Barroso 2007/06/28
- Re: name inconsistency Joe Germuska 2007/06/28
- Re: name inconsistency Musachy Barroso 2007/06/28
- Re: name inconsistency Martin Cooper 2007/06/29