|
Loading...
|
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
Re: Packaging httrack Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray Wed Oct 31 12:08:10 2007
> Maybe you can convince upstream to use an "_" instead of an "-" in this > version string. Yes, I will try that. > httrack also uses a versionid, which does not include a "-", > e.g. httrack 3.41-3 is the same as httrack 3.41.22. I am aware of that. However the 3.41-3-like scheme is more visible. They used it for naming the tarball, widely throughout http://www.httrack.com/page/2/en/index.html, in history.txt, in http://www.httrack.com/page/4/en/index.html and in the output of httrack --help. 3.41.22 has been used for naming the directory that one gets on extracting the release tarball. Therefore I am going with the former scheme after modifying it to 3.41.3 until there is some news from upstream. Cheers, Debarshi -- GPG key ID: 63D4A5A7 Key server: pgp.mit.edu -- fedora-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
- Packaging httrack Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray 2007/10/31
- Re: Packaging httrack Tom \"spot\" Callaway 2007/10/31
- Re: Packaging httrack Till Maas 2007/10/31
- Re: Packaging httrack Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray 2007/10/31 <=