|
Loading...
|
fetchmail-friends@lists.ccil.org
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
[fetchmail] Re: 6.3.0 TODO Sunil Shetye Mon Aug 25 01:58:23 2003
Quoting from Jim Correia's mail on Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 10:54:29PM -0400: > >>>Note that imap servers do not allow adding custom flags. > >> > >>Some do. > > > >Then, is there any way of probing if such a capability is supported by > >the IMAP server? Is there any keyword in the output of either > >CAPABILITY or SELECT? > > NOTE: I am not an IMAP protocol expert. > > It looks like this information comes back from the SELECT command. I'm > looking at section 6.3.1 of RFC 2060 (hoping it is still relevant > today.) > > The server I am currently using fetchmail with does not support custom > permanent flags, so I'm interested in seeing it continue to work with > servers that don't support this (as it appears the spec allows.) Well, each parallel fetchmail will require one separate flag. If there are only a limited number of flags available (and if we omit flags like \Answered and \Flagged which are treated specially by almost all email readers), then there will be unnecessary conflicts and confusion. This effort is worth it only if their are servers supports custom flags. The coding is (probably) going to be the same for both available and custom flags. However, the safer thing to do would be to go for UIDs. > For example two of the built-in flags are \Draft and \Deleted. Oops. Ignore. -- Sunil Shetye.
- [fetchmail] 6.3.0 TODO Matthias Andree 2003/08/17
- [fetchmail] Re: 6.3.0 TODO Sunil Shetye 2003/08/23
- Re: [fetchmail] Re: 6.3.0 TODO Matthias Andree 2003/08/23
- [fetchmail] Re: 6.3.0 TODO Sunil Shetye 2003/08/24
- Re: [fetchmail] Re: 6.3.0 TODO Jim Correia 2003/08/24
- [fetchmail] Re: 6.3.0 TODO Sunil Shetye 2003/08/25 <=
- Re: [fetchmail] Re: 6.3.0 TODO Matthias Andree 2003/08/25
- Re: [fetchmail] Re: 6.3.0 TODO Jim Correia 2003/08/25
- Re: [fetchmail] Re: 6.3.0 TODO Matthias Andree 2003/08/25