|
Loading...
|
fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
[fluent-nhib] Good work, keep it up. Broken Pipe Sat Feb 18 01:00:32 2012
After NH 3.2 was out many were asking why we need FluentNHibernate when there is mapping by code available now. The answer is WE NEED IT, because NH3.2 mapping by code is trash compared to FNH. I have tried using 3.2 code mapping, and it took me 3 full working days to make it work, I have found and fixed 6 bugs during this time, 3 of which were blocking and I have submitted them. And that is only for my Model scenario, I wounder how many bugs still left there..... In short FNH is muuuuuch more stable and mature then NH3.2 mapping by code, good work keep it up. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Fluent NHibernate" group. To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en.
- [fluent-nhib] Good work, keep it up. Broken Pipe 2012/02/18 <=
- [fluent-nhib] Re: Good work, keep it up. Jeff Doolittle 2012/02/19
- [fluent-nhib] Re: Good work, keep it up. tbushell 2012/02/20
- [fluent-nhib] Re: Good work, keep it up. Rasmoo 2012/02/21
- [fluent-nhib] Re: Good work, keep it up. David R. Longnecker 2012/02/22
- [fluent-nhib] Re: Good work, keep it up. Jeff Doolittle 2012/02/23
- [fluent-nhib] Re: Good work, keep it up. Jeff Doolittle 2012/02/21