[Prev] Thread [Next]  |  [Prev] Date [Next]

Re[2]: deleting an alias from interface cause the static route to be deleted Коньков Евгений Tue Feb 21 13:00:43 2012

Здравствуйте, Matthew.

Вы писали 21 февраля 2012 г., 14:10:37:

MS> On 20/02/2012 20:06, Коньков Евгений wrote:
>> vlan74: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
>>         options=3<RXCSUM,TXCSUM>
>>         ether f4:6d:04:7c:7b:d3
>>         inet6 fe80::f66d:4ff:fe7c:7bd3%vlan74 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xd
>>         inet netmask 0xfffffe00 broadcast
>>         inet netmask 0xfffffe00 broadcast
>>         media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>)
>>         status: active
>>         vlan: 74 parent interface: re0
>> ifconfig vlan74 delete
>> will delete these static routes from route table:
>>           UGHS        8      367 vlan74
>>          UGS       275   166969 vlan74           UGHS        8      367 vlan74          UGS       275   166969 vlan74

I had mistake.
>> Does this a bug?

MS> Hmmm... how have you managed to have a next hop address of on
MS> your vlan74 interface, when the local network appears to be
MS> ?  What's the route to -- presumably this is also accessible
MS> on vlan74 ?

MS> It certainly seems odd that your routes have disappeared, but I'm
MS> wondering if they were culled from the routing table because the system
MS> thought they weren't logically connected to the local system?  Given
MS> that they have seen traffic, perhaps this was connected to a different
MS> change that the deletion of that you highlighted?

С уважением,
 Коньков                          mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"