|
Loading...
|
gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
Re: The order of arguments differs Kai Ruottu Mon Feb 20 03:01:29 2012
20.2.2012 10:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] kirjoitti:
First computer : gcc -Wall -Wextra `xml2-config --cflags` -g -O2 `xml2-config --libs` -o xmlparsefile xmlparsefile-main.o make[1]: Leaving directory `/.../1-xmlParseFile/src' make[1]: Entering directory `/.../1-xmlParseFile' make[1]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'. make[1]: Leaving directory `/.../1-xmlParseFile Second computer : gcc -Wall -Wextra `xml2-config --cflags` -g -O2 `xml2-config --libs` -o xmlparsefile xmlparsefile-main.o xmlparsefile-main.o: In function `parseDoc': main.c:(.text+0xd): undefined reference to `xmlParseFile' main.c:(.text+0x51): undefined reference to `xmlParseFile' main.c:(.text+0x63): undefined reference to `xmlParseFile' main.c:(.text+0x68): undefined reference to `xmlParseFile' collect2: ld returned 1 exist status Do you understand why I got this error on one computer, and not on the other?
Too complicated... You should simply look what the command :
gcc -Wall -Wextra `xml2-config --cflags` -g -O2 `xml2-config --libs` \
-o xmlparsefile xmlparsefile-main.o
causes during the link phase. The '-v' option for GCC and '-verbose'
for the linker ('-Wl,-verbose' for GCC) are good tools for this. Just
add them somehow to the process or try the command manually with the
additions :
gcc -v -Wall -Wextra `xml2-config --cflags` -g -O2 \
`xml2-config --libs` -o xmlparsefile xmlparsefile-main.o
gcc -Wl,-verbose -Wall -Wextra `xml2-config --cflags` -g -O2 \
`xml2-config --libs` -o xmlparsefile xmlparsefile-main.o
- The order of arguments differs spam . spam . spam . spam 2012/02/15
- Re: The order of arguments differs Ryan Mansfield 2012/02/15
- Re: The order of arguments differs spam . spam . spam . spam 2012/02/16
- Re: The order of arguments differs spam . spam . spam . spam 2012/02/17
- Re: The order of arguments differs Ian Lance Taylor 2012/02/17
- Re: The order of arguments differs spam . spam . spam . spam 2012/02/20
- Re: The order of arguments differs Kai Ruottu 2012/02/20 <=
- Re: The order of arguments differs spam . spam . spam . spam 2012/02/20
- Re: The order of arguments differs Kai Ruottu 2012/02/20
- Re: The order of arguments differs spam . spam . spam . spam 2012/02/21