Re: Option ordering Diego Novillo Thu May 31 00:00:35 2007
On 5/30/07 7:07 PM, Joe Buck wrote: > How about: have -Wall still set warn_strict_overflow > to 1, but to have -Wall -Wstrict-overflow *or* -Wstrict-overflow -Wall > *or* just -Wstrict-overflow set it to 2? The only change would be > to prevent -Wall from *decreasing* the value. Yes. My idea was along similar lines. Given an umbrella option like -Wall or -Ox, it should only set specific options iff those options are not present in the command line. That means that we have to have presence bits for each option.
- Option ordering Ian Lance Taylor 2007/05/30
- Re: Option ordering Diego Novillo 2007/05/31 <=